Wright v AGL Loy Yang Pty Ltd [2016] FWCFB 4818
[2016] FWCFB 4818
At a glance
Source factsCourt
Fair Work Commission (Full Bench)
Decision date
2016-08-02
Source
Original judgment source is linked above.
© 2026 Zoe. All rights reserved.
Zoe is a legal information platform. Always consult the official source for authoritative text.
[2016] FWCFB 4818
Fair Work Commission (Full Bench)
2016-08-02
Original judgment source is linked above.
(#P67_5779) (1998) CLR 159 (Swaffield)
(#P74_6989) Sinclair v The King [1946] HCA 55; (1946) 73 CLR 316; Tofilau v The Queen [2007] HCA 39; (2007) 231 CLR 396 at [334]
(#P75_7377) [1996] SASC 5462; (1996) 85 A Crim R 120 (Pfitzner) at 135-6
(#P82_8552) Decision at [42] (first bullet point)
(#P83_8605) Decision at [42] (third bullet point)
(#P86_9167) R v Arnott (2009) 214 A Crim R 500 (Arnott) at [25]; applying Swaffield at [77]-[78]
(#P89_9482) Pfitzner at 138
(#P92_9687) Arnott at [28]
(#P95_9961) Arnott at [28]-[31]; Pfitzner at 139-140
(#P132_15019) King v Freshmore (Vic) Pty Ltd (unreported, AIRCFB, Ross VP, Williams SDP, Hingley C, 17 March 2000) Print S4213 at [61]-[62]; s.591 of the FW Act
(#P133_15377) s.135 of the Evidence Act
(#P136_15615) King v Freshmore (Vic) Pty Ltd (unreported, AIRCFB, Ross VP, Williams SDP, Hingley C, 17 March 2000) Print S4213 at [24]
(#P139_16597) R v Arnott (2009) 214 A Crim R 500 (Arnott) at [25]; applying Swaffield at [77]-[78]
(#P142_17045) Ground 1 of the Amended Notice of Appeal
(#P143_17276) Ground 1A of the Amended Notice of Appeal
(#P146_18006) Decision at [42] (first bullet point)
(#P147_18122) Decision at [42] (third bullet point)
(#P156_19577) [2015] FCAFC 55 at [98]- [99]
(#P165_21458) See, for example, City Motor Transport Group v Devcic [2014] FWCFB 6074 and the cases referred to therein, and Jones v Ciuzelis [2015] FWCFB 84
(#P168_21923) Decision at [30]
(#P181_27555) Decision at [41]
(#P182_27724) Decision at [42] (second bullet point)
(#P183_27875) Decision at [42] (third bullet point)
(#P184_27972) Decision at [42] (fourth bullet point)
(#P185_28172) Decision at [42] (fourth bullet point)
(#P186_28512) Decision at [42] (fifth bullet point)
(#P195_29631) Decision at [29]
(#P198_29942) See paragraph [37] above
(#P199_30329) Ibid
(#P208_31288) Decision at [41]
(#P209_31703) Decision at [43]
(#P221_32846) Decision at [42] (second bullet point)
(#P224_33091) AB v2 p376
(#P235_34727) Ibid
(#P238_35963) Decision at [42] (last bullet point)
(#P239_36410) Ibid
(#P254_37866) Decision at [42] (third bullet point)
(#P255_38274) Ibid
(#P256_38486) AB pp107-109
(#P271_40186) Decision at [43]
(#P282_41795) Decision at [41] to [43]
(#P289_42642) AB p 63 PN545-8
(#P290_42805) Ibid
(#P291_42894) Ibid
(#P294_43187) AB p 98 PN941-2
(#P305_45253) Palmer v The Queen [1998] HCA 2; (1998) 193 CLR 1 at 7 to 8
(#P306_45423) R v Uhrig (unreported, Court of Criminal Appeal (NSW), 24 October 1996) at 16 to 17
(#P307_45599) Palmer v The Queen at 6
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
# Wright
AGL Loy Yang Pty Ltd \[2016\] FWCFB 4818
(1946) 73 CLR 316
(1998) 193 CLR 1
(2007) 231 CLR 396