Willis on behalf of the Pilki People v State of Western Australia
[2014] FCA 1293
At a glance
Source factsCourt
Federal Court of Australia
Decision date
2014-12-02
Before
Mr P, Mr J, McKerracher J
Source
Original judgment source is linked above.
Judgment (15 paragraphs)
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT 1 Today the Court sits for a determination of native title pursuant to s 225 of the Native Title Act 1993 (Cth) (Act). 2 The application for native title was first filed with the Court on 12 August 2002 and, on 19 August 2002, it was referred to mediation in the National Native Title Tribunal (Tribunal). It was amended on 1 April 2005, and following acceptance for registration, was entered onto the Register of Native Title Claims on 18 April 2005. There were further amendments this year and last. 3 Various case management conferences were convened between June 2012 and March 2013 before a Registrar of the Court, and on 27 March 2013 orders were made for the filing of pleadings for the purpose of narrowing the issues in contention. As a result of the exchange of pleadings it was agreed between the applicant and the only active respondent, the State of Western Australia (State), that the claim group has native title in the application area and that there should be a determination of native title in respect of the area. An issue which remained in contention between the applicant and the State related to the recognition and determination of the native title right to take and use resources of the land and waters for commercial purposes. 4 After a five day hearing during the period 29 August 2013 to 13 March 2014, reasons for judgment in all matters regarding the remaining issue in contention were delivered by Justice North on 4 July 2014: see Willis on behalf of the Pilki People v State of Western Australia [2014] FCA 714. 5 Those reasons for judgment included an order that the applicant and the State file a draft determination of native title reflecting the reasons for judgment. That occurred on 12 September 2014. 6 The draft determination includes the making of an order that the determination of native title will not take effect until a Prescribed Body Corporate (PBC) is nominated under s 56 or s 57 of the Act. This is because at the date of the determination of native title, a PBC will not have been established and consequently the applicant does not request the Court to make a determination regarding a PBC in accordance with ss 55, 56, and 57 of the Act. 7 Although not every aspect of this outcome has been reached by agreement, there has still been much cooperation involved in finally reaching this important point. The applicant and the State, the non-State respondent parties, the legal representatives and all those involved in reaching this point are congratulated. 8 There are two important points to make before concluding. The first is that in making a determination of native title, the Court is not creating it as such but rather recognising what has always existed. Secondly, the nature of the determination recognises not just the rights of the applicant but also how the applicant's rights operate in relation to other interests, including those of the respondents. 9 Accordingly, I now make the determination of native title pursuant to the Native Title Act 1993 (Cth) in the terms proposed in the draft determination filed 12 September 2014 which has been agreed between the parties. 10 The determination of native title so made is attached to these reasons. I certify that the preceding ten (10) numbered paragraphs are a true copy of the Reasons for Judgment herein of the Honourable Justice McKerracher.