United States legal-change intelligence across legislation, regulation, and case law. Separate data plane, same Zoe spine.

Platform

Legislation
Cases
Ask Zoe
Recently analysed

Company

Pricing
API
X
LinkedIn
Instagram

Jurisdictions

Federal
Supreme Court

District of Columbia

© 2026 Zoe. All rights reserved.

Zoe is a legal information platform. Always consult the official source for authoritative text.

Vamot Pty Ltd v Tempacoe Pty Ltd Anor [2000] VSC 251 - VSC 2000 case summary — Zoe

Legislation Cases Absurdities Ask Zoe Graph Pricing

Home/Cases/[2000] VSC 251

VICVSC

Vamot Pty Ltd v Tempacoe Pty Ltd Anor [2000] VSC 251

[2000] VSC 251

Supreme Court of Victoria|2000-06-07|Before: BEACH, J.

View original source

At a glance

Source facts

Court

Supreme Court of Victoria

Decision date

2000-06-07

Before

BEACH, J.

Source

Original judgment source is linked above.

Judgment (1 paragraphs)

[1]

The application is dismissed. I order that the plaintiff pay the defendant's costs of the application, including any reserved costs.

Parties

Applicant/Plaintiff:

# Vamot Pty Ltd

Respondent/Defendant:

Tempacoe Pty Ltd Anor \[2000\] VSC 251

Legislation Cited (6)

Jurisdiction of Courts (Cross Vesting) Act 1987

Administrative Tribunal Act 1998

Practices Act 1974

Trading Act 1985

Jurisdiction of Courts Cross-Vesting Act 1987

Fair Trading Act 1999

Cases Cited (1)

In my opinion, in light of the decision of the High Court in Re Wakim [1999] HCA 27; 1999, 73 A.L.J.R. 839, it is somewhat doubtful whether this Court now has jurisdiction to transfer an action pending in it to the Federal Court even though it may be associated with an action already on foot in that Court.