QLDQCA
Tyler v Krause & Ors [2002] QCA 295
[2002] QCA 295
Court of Appeal (Qld)|2002-11-09|Before: McPherson JA, White and Wilson JJSeparate reasons, for judgment of each member of the Court, each concurring as to the order, made.
View original sourceAt a glance
Source factsCourt
Court of Appeal (Qld)
Decision date
2002-11-09
Before
McPherson JA, White and Wilson JJSeparate reasons, for judgment of each member of the Court, each concurring as to the order, made.
Catchwords
- CRIMINAL LAW - GENERAL MATTERS - OTHER GENERAL MATTERS - DISABILITIES AND
- DISQUALIFICATIONS OF CONVICTED PERSONS - OTHER CASES -
- prisoner instituted
- proceedings without permission of Public Trustee - whether permission can be
Source
Original judgment source is linked above.
Catchwords
CRIMINAL LAW - GENERAL MATTERS - OTHER GENERAL MATTERS - DISABILITIES ANDDISQUALIFICATIONS OF CONVICTED PERSONS - OTHER CASES -prisoner institutedproceedings without permission of Public Trustee - whether permission can begranted nunc pro tuncConvicts Forfeitures Act 1871 of NewZealandForfeiture Act 187033 & 34 Vic c 23, s 8TheEscheat (Procedure and Amendment) Act of 1891 (Qld)The Public CuratorAct of 1915, s 85(2), s 86(2)Public Trustee Act 1978 (Qld) s90(a), s 91, s 94(2), s 95, s 95(b)Fitzpatrick vJackson [1989] 2 Qd R 542, appliedGeorgiadis v Australian &Overseas Telecommunications Corporation (1994) 179 CLR 297,appliedJol v State of New South Wales (1998) 45 NSWLR 283,consideredProject Blue Sky Inc v Australian Broadcasting Authority[1998] HCA 28(1998) 194 CLR 355, mentionedPrus-Grzybowski v Everingham (1983) ALR468, 478, mentioned
Judgment
Judgment text is temporarily unavailable while the source document is re-fetched.