/

/

Where to start with an Australian legal problem: plain-English guides, with the legislation and case law behind them.

Platform

Legislation
Cases
Guides
Find a lawyer
Absurdities
Ask Zoe
Graph
Recently analysed

Free tools

Bond claim checker
Barking dog and noise diary
Support at Home statement check
All tools

Lawyers: our picks

Lawyers in Sydney
Lawyers in Melbourne
Lawyers in Brisbane
Lawyers in Perth
Family lawyers
Employment lawyers
Criminal lawyers
Wills and estates lawyers
Find a lawyer

Company

Pricing
API
Privacy
Terms
Support
X
LinkedIn
Instagram

Jurisdictions

Commonwealth
New South Wales
Queensland
Victoria
Western Australia
South Australia
Tasmania
Australian Capital Territory
Northern Territory

© 2026 Zoe. All rights reserved.

Zoe gives general legal information, not legal advice. For the authoritative text, check the official register of the law's own jurisdiction, such as the Federal Register of Legislation for Commonwealth laws.

The Queen v TR & VG [2004] ACTSC 10 | Case summary | Zoe

Legislation Cases Guides Find a lawyer Absurdities Ask Zoe Graph Pricing

Home/Cases/[2004] ACTSC 10

ACTACTSC

The Queen v TR & VG [2004] ACTSC 10

[2004] ACTSC 10

Supreme Court of the ACT|2004-03-19

View original source

Ask Zoe how this case applies to you

Free, no account needed. General information, not legal advice.

General information, not legal advice.

At a glance

Source facts

Court

Supreme Court of the ACT

Decision date

2004-03-19

Source

Original judgment source is linked above.

Judgment (1 paragraphs)

[1]

The Queen v TR & VG [2004] ACTSC 10 (19 March 2004)

Parties

Applicant/Plaintiff:

The Queen

Respondent/Defendant:

TR & VG [2004] ACTSC 10