//
© 2026 Zoe. All rights reserved.
Zoe is a legal information platform. Always consult the Federal Register of Legislation for authoritative text.
[2009] FamCA 254
Family Court of Australia
2009-05-01
Original judgment source is linked above.
DISCLAIMER - Every effort has been made to comply with suppression orders or statutory provisions prohibiting publication that may apply to this judgment or decision. The onus remains on any person using material in the judgment or decision to ensure that the intended use of that material does not breach any such order or provision. Further enquiries may be directed to the Registry of the Court or Tribunal in which it was generated.
CITATION: The Council of the Law Society of New South Wales v. Dimitriou [2009] NSWADT 249
Allinson v. General Council of Medical Education and Registration [1984] 1KB 750 Dalziel v. Belladonna [2009] FamCA 254 CASES CITED: The Law Society of NSW v. Foreman(No. 2) (1994) 34 NSWLR 404 NSW Bar Association v. Cummins (2001) 52 NSWLR 279 Prothonotary v. McCaffery [2004] NSWCA 470 Silas v. Barry [2009] FMCAfam 448
16 The Law Society submitted that the "consequence of the Tribunal making the orders sought by the Society is not that the Respondent could never be so employed, but rather, that the Respondent could not be employed without approval under s.17 of the Act". Such an approval "could be subject to conditions" and the Law Society referred to Hegney v. Law Society of NSW [2008] NSWADT 150.
[2009] FamCA 181
(1994) 34 NSWLR 404
(2001) 52 NSWLR 279