© 2026 Zoe. All rights reserved.
Zoe is a legal information platform. Always consult the Federal Register of Legislation for authoritative text.
[2021] NSWSC 1118
Supreme Court of NSW
2021-08-12
Wright J, Fullerton J
Original judgment source is linked above.
Solicitors: Criminal Assets Litigation, Australian Federal Police (Plaintiff) Mills Oakley (Second Respondent) File Number(s): 2017/146280
Background
The items of property
Table of Properties Item Property Description Owner Section 18 Order
Persons affected by the orders sought in the notice of motion
Ms Han's position
Declaration under s 95 of the POC Act
Relevant statutory provisions
Section 95(a)
Section 95(b)
Forfeiture under s 92
"Conviction day"
Section 92(1)(a) requirements
Section 92(1)(b)(i) requirements
Section 92(1)(c) requirement
An additional observation
Conclusion on forfeiture under s 95(b)
Exercise of discretion whether to make the declaration under s 95
Conclusion and orders
Amendments 06 September 2021 - Date amended under the Slip Rule. DISCLAIMER - Every effort has been made to comply with suppression orders or statutory provisions prohibiting publication that may apply to this judgment or decision. The onus remains on any person using material in the judgment or decision to ensure that the intended use of that material does not breach any such order or provision. Further enquiries may be directed to the Registry of the Court or Tribunal in which it was generated. Decision last updated: 06 September 2021
The Commissioner of the Australian Federal Police
Cranston