//
© 2026 Zoe. All rights reserved.
Zoe is a legal information platform. Always consult the Federal Register of Legislation for authoritative text.
austlii:cth/MRTA/2003/4071
defendant. The Tribunal decided that the application for review was ineligible because the review application was not lodged within the prescribed period for applying for review, as required by paragraph...
No linked legislation citations have been extracted yet.
The Migration Review Tribunal decided that Mr Thapaliya's application to review his subclass 457 visa decision could not be considered because it was not submitted within the time limit allowed by law. Under the Migration Act, review applications must be lodged within a specific period, and because this deadline was missed, the Tribunal could not review the merits of the original visa decision.
AI-generated legal information, not legal advice. Zoe can make mistakes. Check the cited source, and for advice about your situation consult a qualified Australian lawyer.
The review application was not lodged within the prescribed period for applying for review.
This is a requirement of paragraph 347(1)(b) of the Migration Act 1958.
The Tribunal decided that the application for review was ineligible because the review application was not lodged within the prescribed period for applying for review, as required by paragraph 347(1)(b) of the Migration Act 1958.