© 2026 Zoe. All rights reserved.
Zoe is a legal information platform. Always consult the Federal Register of Legislation for authoritative text.
[2023] FWC 750
Fair Work Commission
2023-04-11
Original judgment source is linked above.
[2023] FWC 750 [Note: An appeal pursuant to s.604 (C2023/2444) was lodged against this decision.]
s.394 - Application for unfair dismissal remedy
[1] On 10 February 2023 Ms Tayla Brittany Higgins (Ms Higgins) made an application to the Fair Work Commission (FWC) pursuant to s.394 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) (FW Act) alleging she was unfairly dismissed from her employment as a Paramedic with FQM Australia Nickel Pty Ltd (FQM) on 28 December 2022.
[2] An unfair dismissal application must be lodged with the FWC within 21 days after the dismissal takes effect. The FWC may only allow a further period for lodgement in exceptional circumstances.
[3] Ms Higgins has made an application for an extension of time to file the Application. FQM oppose the application.
[4] Directions for the filing of materials were issued to the parties on 7 March 2023 (Directions). The Application was listed for a hearing on 3 April 2023 to determine the application for an extension of time (Hearing).
[6] FQM sought permission to be represented at the Hearing.
[7] Having considered the submissions of the parties, leave was granted to FQM to be represented pursuant to section 596(2)(a) of the FW Act on the grounds that it would enable the matter to be dealt with more efficiently taking into account the complexity of the matter.
[8] At the Hearing Ms Higgins appeared on her behalf and Ms Erica Hartley of HWL Ebsworth (Ms Hartley) appeared on behalf of FQM.
[10] Ms Higgins gave further evidence at the Hearing and was cross examined by Ms Hartley. FQM chose not to cross examine any of Ms Higgin's other witnesses.
[12] On the morning of the Hearing Ms Higgins forwarded to Chambers and to FQM's legal representatives a letter from her treating psychologist Ms Nadia Cunningham (Ms Cunningham) dated 24 March 2023. Ms Higgins says that she received the letter on, or around, 24 March 2023 but could not explain why she did not file it with the FWC earlier. FGM opposed the admission of the letter. Ms Cunningham was not available for cross examination. I admitted the letter and marked it Exhibit A1 but explained to Ms Higgins that in the absence of Ms Cunningham being available for cross examination I would attach less weight to Ms Cunningham's evidence as set out in the letter.
[13] A digital court book containing the evidence and submissions of the parties was prepared by the parties and filed in the FWC on 30 March 2023 (DCB). The DCB admitted at the Hearing as an exhibit and marked Exhibit DCB1.
[14] An Agreed Statement of Facts was admitted at the Hearing and marked Exhibit A2.
[15] Both parties were invited to make oral closing submissions. Both parties did so.
[16] In reaching my decision, I have considered all the submissions made and the evidence tendered by the parties including these materials, even if not expressly referred to in these reasons for decision.
[19] Ms Higgins' primary responsibility in her role was to provide emergency medical services on-site as part of the Emergency Response Team performing a roster of eight days on and 6 days off.
"Overall, communications with Tayla has been difficult and I am uncertain as to why she is reporting difficulty accessing the EAP.
_Following her initial contact to WL (12/9/2022) the psychologist, on multiple occasions, attempted to contact Tayla. Contact was eventually made, with the Psych able to offer and schedule a time to speak with Tay/a at short notice (
Tayla Brittany Higgins
FQM Australia Nickel Pty Ltd [2023] FWC 750