QLDQCA
Tait v Tatnell [2001] QCA 562
[2001] QCA 562
Court of Appeal (Qld)|2001-12-11|Before: Thomas JA, Douglas and Mullins JJJudgment of the Court
View original sourceAt a glance
Source factsCourt
Court of Appeal (Qld)
Decision date
2001-12-11
Before
Thomas JA, Douglas and Mullins JJJudgment of the Court
Catchwords
- ADMINISTRATIVE LAW - JUDICIAL REVIEW LEGISLATION - appellant filed a claim
- in the Small Claims Tribunal under the Residential Tenancies Act 1994 -
- appellant’s claim was dismissed for lack of jurisdiction - appellant made
- an application to the Supreme Court for reasons
Source
Original judgment source is linked above.
Catchwords
ADMINISTRATIVE LAW - JUDICIAL REVIEW LEGISLATION - appellant filed a claimin the Small Claims Tribunal under the Residential Tenancies Act 1994 -appellant’s claim was dismissed for lack of jurisdiction - appellant madean application to the Supreme Court for reasonsfor decision - application wasrefused - appellant appeals from that decision - whether the decision appealedfrom was wrong - whetherHardiman principle was breached - whetherappellant should have been granted a review of the decision of therespondent.Judiciary Act 1903, s 78BJudicial Review Act1991, s 4, s 49, s 50(b), s 56Residential Tenancies Act 1994, s23(1), s 250Small Claims Tribunals Act 1973, s 22ACarruthers v Connolly [1998] 1 Qd R 339Cypressvale PtyLtd v Retail Shop Leases Tribunal [1995] QCA 187[1996] 2 Qd R 462The Queen vAustralian Broadcasting Tribunalex parte Hardiman [1980] HCA 13(1980) 144 CLR 13
Judgment
Judgment text is temporarily unavailable while the source document is re-fetched.