© 2026 Zoe. All rights reserved.
Zoe is a legal information platform. Always consult the Federal Register of Legislation for authoritative text.
[2001] QCA 562
Court of Appeal (Qld)
2001-12-11
Thomas JA, Douglas and Mullins JJJudgment of the Court
Original judgment source is linked above.
Text from the judgment source.
SUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND
CITATION:
Tait v Tatnell [2001] QCA 562
PARTIES:
WILLIAM PETER TAIT
(applicant/appellant)
v
GRAHAM TATNELL
(respondent/respondent)
FILE NO/S:
Appeal No 5854 of 2001
SC No 199 of 2001
DIVISION:
Court of Appeal
PROCEEDING:
General Civil Appeal
ORIGINATING COURT:
Supreme Court at Townsville
DELIVERED ON:
11 December 2001
DELIVERED AT:
Brisbane
HEARING DATE:
Heard on the papers
JUDGES:
Thomas JA, Douglas and Mullins JJ
Judgment of the Court
ORDER:
Appeal dismissed with costs.
CATCHWORDS:
ADMINISTRATIVE LAW - JUDICIAL REVIEW LEGISLATION - appellant filed a claim in the Small Claims Tribunal under the Residential Tenancies Act 1994 - appellant's claim was dismissed for lack of jurisdiction - appellant made an application to the Supreme Court for reasons for decision - application was refused - appellant appeals from that decision - whether the decision appealed from was wrong - whether Hardiman principle was breached - whether appellant should have been granted a review of the decision of the respondent.
Judicial Review Act 1991, s 4, s 49, s 50(b), s 56
Residential Tenancies Act 1994, s 23(1), s 250
Small Claims Tribunals Act 1973, s 22A
Carruthers v Connolly [1998] 1 Qd R 339
Cypressvale Pty Ltd v Retail Shop Leases Tribunal [1995] QCA 187; [1996] 2 Qd R 462
The Queen v Australian Broadcasting Tribunal; ex parte Hardiman [1980] HCA 13; (1980) 144 CLR 13
COUNSEL:
The appellant on his own behalf
SA McLeod for the respondent
SOLICITORS:
The appellant on his own behalf
Crown Solicitor for the respondent
Tait
Tatnell [2001] QCA 562
(1980) 144 CLR 13