'The parapet of the south 'tower' achieves the preferred height of 76 metres.'

1. By letter dated 24 December 2009, Deacons, acting for the permit applicant, drew the Tribunal's attention to what they suggested were some errors within the Tribunal's order, and submitted that the Order should be corrected. These errors were identified as follows:
   1. In paragraph 16, the southern tower is stated to have a parapet height of 85.5 metres.

It should be corrected to RL of 85.5 or a height above ground of 76 metres.

1. In paragraph 20 it is stated that the northern tower exceeds the preferred height by approximately 36 metres to the top of the angled roof or around 31 metres to the top of the parapet. It is also stated that the parapet of the southern tower exceeds the preferred height by up to 10 metres.

These should be corrected because the northern tower exceeds the preferred height by 27.4 metres (the difference between RL112.9 and RL85.5), the top of the northern tower parapet exceeds the preferred height by approximately 21.3 metres (the difference between RL 106.8 and RL 85.5) and the height of the south tower is 76 metres and therefore does not exceed the preferred height.

1. The plans have been rechecked and it is apparent that the errors have been primarily caused by mixing up heights above ground level and RL heights. The DDO 8 makes reference to a preferred height above ground level of 76 metres. It is therefore appropriate to amend paragraphs 16 and 20 to make consistent reference to the correct height in RL.
2. Section 119 of the Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 1998 provides that the Tribunal may correct an order made by it if the order contains:

1. a clerical mistake; 2. an error arising from an accidental slip or omission;

1. a material miscalculation of figures or a material mistake in the description of any person, thing or matter referred to in the order; or

1. a defect of form.
2. I am satisfied that a mistake or error has occurred here comprising a miscalculation of figures concerning building height and find it appropriate to authorise a correction of the order.