Zoe

Where to start with an Australian legal problem: plain-English guides, with the legislation and case law behind them.

Platform

Legislation
Cases
Guides
Find a lawyer
Absurdities
Ask Zoe
Graph
Recently analysed

Free tools

Bond claim checker
Barking dog and noise diary
Support at Home statement check
All tools

Lawyers: our picks

Zoe

Where to start with an Australian legal problem: plain-English guides, with the legislation and case law behind them.

Platform

Legislation
Cases
Guides
Find a lawyer
Absurdities
Ask Zoe
Graph
Recently analysed

Free tools

Bond claim checker
Barking dog and noise diary
Support at Home statement check
All tools

Lawyers: our picks

Lawyers in Sydney
Lawyers in Melbourne
Lawyers in Brisbane
Lawyers in Perth
Family lawyers
Employment lawyers
Criminal lawyers
Wills and estates lawyers
Find a lawyer

Company

Pricing
API
Privacy
Terms
Support
X
LinkedIn
Instagram

Jurisdictions

Commonwealth
New South Wales
Queensland
Victoria
Western Australia
South Australia
Tasmania
Australian Capital Territory
Northern Territory

Zoe is a legal information platform. Always consult the Federal Register of Legislation for authoritative text.

Staats and National Archives of Australia [2009] AATA 598 | Case summary | Zoe

Zoe

Legislation Cases Guides Find a lawyer Absurdities Ask Zoe Graph Pricing

Ask Zoe →

Home/Cases/[2009] AATA 598

CTHAATA

Staats and National Archives of Australia [2009] AATA 598; (2009) 50 AAR 147 (3 June 2009)

[2009] AATA 598

Administrative Appeals Tribunal of Australia|2009-06-03

View original source

At a glance

Source facts

Court

Administrative Appeals Tribunal of Australia

Decision date

2009-06-03

Source

Original judgment source is linked above.

Judgment (5 paragraphs)

[1]

For the reasons given I decided that the application by Mr Staats for an extension of time in which to make an application for a review of the decision of the National Archives of Australia made 5 June 2008 should be refused.

[2]

I certify that the 21 preceding paragraphs are a true copy of the reasons for the decision herein of J.W. Constance, Senior Member.

[3]

Signed: .......................[sgd].........................................................

[4]

Solicitor for the Respondent Australian Government Solicitor

[5]

[1] Copy of decision attached to application for review.

Legislation Cited (2)

Appeals Tribunal Act 1975

Information Act 1982

Cases Cited (3)

Staats and National Archives of Australia [2009] AATA 598; (2009) 50 AAR 147 (3 June 2009)

Re Hempel and Civil Aviation Safety Authority [2006] AATA 188; (2006) 90 ALD 118

Re Anti-Fluoridation Association of Victoria and Secretary, Department of Health [1985] AATA 201; (1985) 8 ALD 163