Zoe

Where to start with an Australian legal problem: plain-English guides, with the legislation and case law behind them.

Platform

Legislation
Cases
Guides
Find a lawyer
Absurdities
Ask Zoe
Graph
Recently analysed

Free tools

Bond claim checker
Barking dog and noise diary
Support at Home statement check
All tools

Lawyers: our picks

Zoe

Where to start with an Australian legal problem: plain-English guides, with the legislation and case law behind them.

Platform

Legislation
Cases
Guides
Find a lawyer
Absurdities
Ask Zoe
Graph
Recently analysed

Free tools

Bond claim checker
Barking dog and noise diary
Support at Home statement check
All tools

Lawyers: our picks

Lawyers in Sydney
Lawyers in Melbourne
Lawyers in Brisbane
Lawyers in Perth
Family lawyers
Employment lawyers
Criminal lawyers
Wills and estates lawyers
Find a lawyer

Company

Pricing
API
Privacy
Terms
Support
X
LinkedIn
Instagram

Jurisdictions

Commonwealth
New South Wales
Queensland
Victoria
Western Australia
South Australia
Tasmania
Australian Capital Territory
Northern Territory

Zoe is a legal information platform. Always consult the Federal Register of Legislation for authoritative text.

Smith v The Queen [1970] HCA 48 | Case summary | Zoe

Zoe

Legislation Cases Guides Find a lawyer Absurdities Ask Zoe Graph Pricing

Ask Zoe →

Home/Cases/[1970] HCA 48

CTHHCA

Smith v The Queen

[1970] HCA 48

High Court of Australia|1970-07-01|Before: Walsh JJ, McTiernan J, Menzies J

View original source

At a glance

Source facts

Court

High Court of Australia

Decision date

1970-07-01

Before

Walsh JJ, McTiernan J, Menzies J

Source

Original judgment source is linked above.

Judgment (1 paragraphs)

[1]

The application for special leave to appeal should be refused.

Parties

Applicant/Plaintiff:

Smith

Respondent/Defendant:

The Queen

Cases Cited (1)

High Court of Australia McTiernan, Menzies, Windeyer, Owen and Walsh JJ. Smith v The Queen [1970] HCA 48

Cited By (1)

R (Cth) v Milne