The appellant now seeks to appeal to this Court. The difficulty with which he is confronted in doing so is that the section of the Justices Act, which as I have said is s.222, conferring a right of appeal to a District Court Judge, provides that the determination of that District Court Judge on the appeal to him, "shall be final between the parties to the appeal".

The result, therefore, in this instance, is that, having suffered his appeal to be determined by the District Court Judge, as happened in this case, the determination of that Judge is final and this Court has no power to deal with the appeal that is now sought to be brought to it from that determination.

I perhaps ought to add that, in the course of making his submissions before us, the appellant raised again, as he has done in several other matters in the past, the question of whether a proper system of currency prevails in this country. For my part, I would say simply that the question that was before the magistrate was whether the appellant had, in common parlance, lodged his tax return, not whether he was able to pay or discharge in any form whatsoever, or by any means whatsoever, any liability to taxation that might follow on from lodging the tax return. The question that as I say was sought to be raised as it has been in the past, was therefore, as I see it, not in any way relevant to the proceedings in the Magistrates Court.

PINCUS JA: I agree and I would add only that Mr. Skyring, I'm sure, understands the point that the complaint is not about the content of his return but about not having put returns in.