[2026] FWC 1169
General information, not legal advice.
Fair Work Commission
2026-04-07
Original judgment source is linked above.
For the reasons outlined above I am not satisfied that I should make an order for costs against Mr Goss pursuant to s 611 of the Act. Accordingly Dental Advance's application seeking costs against Mr Goss is dismissed.
[4] [2011] FWAFB 4014, 2011 IR 174 at [10]; more recently followed in Vassallo v Easitag Pty Ltd [2021] FWCFB 3974.
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
Shawn Taka Edward Goss
Cornerstone Dental Group Pty Ltd [2026] FWC 1169
[25] It is relevant to record that the limitation placed on the discretion to award costs in proceedings under the Act, including in the Commission, serves an important purpose which informs its exercise. In Ryan v Primesafe [2015] FCA 8, Mortimer J (as her Honour then was) observed in relation to s 570: