Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
Parties
Applicant/Plaintiff:
Shaelynn Katipa
Respondent/Defendant:
Metcash DC [2025] FWC 1988
Legislation Cited (1)
Work Act 2009
Cases Cited (2)
Shaelynn Katipa v Metcash DC [2025] FWC 1988 (11 July 2025)
[8]Section 587 confers a discretion on the Commission to dismiss Ms Katipa's application if it has not been made in accordance with the Act. Ms Katipa has had ample opportunity to rectify the deficiency in her application and has had ample opportunity to show why her application should not be dismissed under s.587 (see generally Bond v Carbridge Pty Ltd T/A Carbridge[2024] FWC 1302 at [15]- [16] and the cases cited therein).