Applicant/Plaintiff:

Where to start with an Australian legal problem: plain-English guides, with the legislation and case law behind them.

Platform

Legislation
Cases
Guides
Find a lawyer
Absurdities
Ask Zoe
Graph
Recently analysed

Free tools

Bond claim checker
Barking dog and noise diary
Support at Home statement check
All tools

Lawyers: our picks

Lawyers in Sydney
Lawyers in Melbourne
Lawyers in Brisbane
Lawyers in Perth
Family lawyers
Employment lawyers
Criminal lawyers
Wills and estates lawyers
Find a lawyer

Company

Pricing
API
Privacy
Terms
Support
X
LinkedIn
Instagram

Jurisdictions

Commonwealth
New South Wales
Queensland
Victoria
Western Australia
South Australia
Tasmania
Australian Capital Territory
Northern Territory

Zoe gives general legal information, not legal advice. For the authoritative text, check the official register of the law's own jurisdiction, such as the Federal Register of Legislation for Commonwealth laws.

Schimmel v Commonwealth of Australia [1993] NTSC 128 | Case summary | Zoe

Zoe

Legislation Cases Guides Find a lawyer Absurdities Ask Zoe Graph Pricing

Ask Zoe →

Home/Cases/[1993] NTSC 128

NTNTSC

Schimmel v Commonwealth of Australia [1993] NTSC 128; 113 FLR 205

[1993] NTSC 128

Supreme Court of the NT|1993-05-12

View original source

General information, not legal advice.

Ask Zoe about this case

Free, no account needed. General information, not legal advice.

At a glance

Source facts

Court

Supreme Court of the NT

Decision date

1993-05-12

Source

Original judgment source is linked above.

Judgment (3 paragraphs)

[1]

Schimmel v Commonwealth of Australia [1993] NTSC 128; 113 FLR 205 (12 May 1993)

[2]

Schimmel v Commonwealth of Australia [1993] NTSC 128; 113 FLR 205 (12 May 1993)

[3]

There is no available HTML version of this document. Please wait to view PDF version or click on [Download] for other versions.

Parties

Applicant/Plaintiff:

Schimmel

Respondent/Defendant:

Commonwealth of Australia [1993] NTSC 128; 113 FLR 205