[2026] NSWCATAP 24
General information, not legal advice.
NCAT Appeal Panel
2026-01-30
S Westgarth, Deputy PresidentD Goldstein, Senior Member
Original judgment source is linked above.
(1) The Respondent seeks an order that the Appellant pay its costs on the ordinary basis as it was wholly successful in the appeal.
(2) The Appeal Panel has jurisdiction to make the order requested by operation of r 38 and r 38 A(2) of the (NSW) (the Rules).
(3) The amount in dispute in the claim against the Respondent exceeded $30,000 and as such the Appeal Panel has jurisdiction to make a costs order by the operation of r 38A(2).
(4) The general position under the Uniform Civil Procedure Rules (the UCPR) is that costs follow the event and that a successful party will be generally entitled to payment of all of their costs reasonably incurred by the unsuccessful party. We interpose here to make the comment that the UCPR has no operation or direct relevance to the costs regime provided under the Rules or under the Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW) (the NCAT Act).
(5) The position in NCAT under the Rules is essentially the same as for the UCPR but that the decision to award costs is discretionary. The starting point for a costs award under r 38(2) is still that a successful party should be entitled to the usual order as to costs: Thompson v Chapman [2016] NSWCATAP 6 at [69]. Where proceedings in NCAT are heard and determined on the merits the common law provides that NCAT should respect the "well-established position at common law; that is that the purpose of making a costs order is to provide compensation to the party in whose favour the order is made for the expense the party has been put to in prosecuting or defending legal proceedings": The Owners SP 89023 v AT Building Pty Ltd (No 2) [2019] NSWCATAP 215 at [10].
(6) Accordingly, where a party has been successful in defending a claim before NCAT and the discretion under r 38(2) is enlivened the Tribunal should make the usual order as to costs being that the unsuccessful party pay all of the costs of the successful party that were reasonably incurred.
(7) The Respondent does not oppose this costs application being dealt with on the papers and a further hearing being dispensed with.
(1) The Appellant is to pay the Respondent's costs of the appeal on the ordinary basis in an amount agreed between the parties or, in the absence of an agreement, as assessed.
(2) A hearing on the question of costs on the appeal is dispensed with.
I hereby certify that this is a true and accurate record of the reasons for decision of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal of New South Wales.
Schach
Dowdy Constructions Pty Ltd