Where to start with an Australian legal problem: plain-English guides, with the legislation and case law behind them.

Platform

Legislation
Cases
Guides
Find a lawyer
Absurdities
Ask Zoe
Graph
Recently analysed

Free tools

Bond claim checker
Barking dog and noise diary
Support at Home statement check
All tools

Lawyers: our picks

Zoe

Where to start with an Australian legal problem: plain-English guides, with the legislation and case law behind them.

Platform

Legislation
Cases
Guides
Find a lawyer
Absurdities
Ask Zoe
Graph
Recently analysed

Free tools

Bond claim checker
Barking dog and noise diary
Support at Home statement check
All tools

Lawyers: our picks

Lawyers in Sydney
Lawyers in Melbourne
Lawyers in Brisbane
Lawyers in Perth
Family lawyers
Employment lawyers
Criminal lawyers
Wills and estates lawyers
Find a lawyer

Company

Pricing
API
Privacy
Terms
Support
X
LinkedIn
Instagram

Jurisdictions

Commonwealth
New South Wales
Queensland
Victoria
Western Australia
South Australia
Tasmania
Australian Capital Territory
Northern Territory

Zoe is a legal information platform. Always consult the Federal Register of Legislation for authoritative text.

Sanderson v Bradley [2004] VSC 231 | Case summary | Zoe

Zoe

Legislation Cases Guides Find a lawyer Absurdities Ask Zoe Graph Pricing

Ask Zoe →

Home/Cases/[2004] VSC 231

VICVSC

Sanderson v Bradley [2004] VSC 231

[2004] VSC 231

Supreme Court of Victoria|2004-06-30|Before: Balmford J

View original source

At a glance

Source facts

Court

Supreme Court of Victoria

Decision date

2004-06-30

Before

Balmford J

Source

Original judgment source is linked above.

Judgment (1 paragraphs)

[1]

For the reasons given, the application will be dismissed. Counsel may wish to make submissions as to costs.

Parties

Applicant/Plaintiff:

Sanderson

Respondent/Defendant:

Bradley [2004] VSC 231

Cases Cited (1)

Testator's Family Maintenance - application by sister - ademption of a specific devise to plaintiff - no part of residual to pass to plaintiff - whether deceased had assumed an obligation or responsibility to make provision for the plaintiff Administration and Probate Act 1958 s 91 Marshall v Spillane

[2001] VSC 371