© 2026 Zoe. All rights reserved.
Zoe is a legal information platform. Always consult the Federal Register of Legislation for authoritative text.
[2015] VCAT 204
Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal
2015-03-03
Mr P
Original judgment source is linked above.
When approved, the plans will be endorsed and will then form part of this Permit.
Note: This does not obviate the need for a permit where one is required.
Car spaces, access lanes and driveways shown on the endorsed plans must not be used for any other purpose.
Once approved the Construction Management Plan will be endorsed to form part of this permit and must be complied with to the satisfaction of the Responsible Authority and must not be varied except with the written approval of the Responsible Authority.
Once approved this document must be complied with to the satisfaction of the Responsible Authority and must not be varied except with the written approval of the Responsible Authority.
Once approved the Waste Management Plan will be endorsed to form part of this permit and must be complied with to the satisfaction of the Responsible Authority and must not be varied except with the written approval of the Responsible Authority.
All bins and receptacles used for the storage and collection of garbage, bottles and other solid wastes must be kept in a storage area screened from view, to the satisfaction of the Responsible Authority.
All bins and receptacles must be maintained in a clean and tidy condition and free from offensive odour, to the satisfaction of the Responsible Authority.
In accordance with Section 69 of the Planning and Environment Act 1987, an application may be submitted to the Responsible Authority for an extension of the periods referred to in this condition.
[1] We have considered the submissions of all the parties that appeared, all the written and oral evidence, all the exhibits tendered by the parties, and all the statements of grounds filed by parties that did not appear. We do not recite or refer to all of the contents of those documents in these reasons. Subsequent to the hearing, correspondence was received from the Applicant. With the exception of our order dated 4 February 2015, leave had not been granted to the parties to make further submissions. Accordingly, we have not taken the contents of that correspondence into account in making our decision.
[3] We have referred to setbacks taken at the title boundary. Mr Bastone makes reference to setback distances at page 14 of his Evidence which include the 3.04 metre laneway.
[4] 52 Park Street Pty Ltd v Port Phillip CC [2013] VCAT 2199.
Rosenwald
Glen Eira CC [2015] VCAT 204
52 Park Street Pty Ltd v Port Phillip CC [2013] VCAT 2199