Fair Work Commission|2026-03-25

The application under s.365 of the (Cth) made by Ms Duncan on 5 January 2026 is dismissed.

[1] See Dr Bing Du v University of Ballarat [2011] FWAFB 5225, (2011) 211 IR 382; Birch v Wesco Electrics (1966) Pty Ltd [2012] FMCA 5, (2012) 218 IR 67; Lawless v Qantas Airways Ltd [2014] FWC 744; Qantas Airways Ltd v Lawless [2014] FWCFB 3582; Ioannou v Northern Belting Services Pty Ltd [2014] FWCFB 6660; Hazledine v Wakerley [2017] FWCFB 500, (2017) 266 IR 118; Dias v Commonwealth Bank Group [2021] FCCA 601; Minhas v United Workers Union [2024] FWC 805 and Dixon v United Workers' Union [2024] FWCFB 442, (2024) 337 IR 1.

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

Rebecca Hope Duncan v Bullivants Pty Ltd [2026] FWC 1016 (25 March 2026)

[10] The Full Bench in Dixon v United Workers' Union [2024] FWCFB 442 at [20]- [22], (2024) 337 IR 1 at 7-8 provided a helpful summary of how the Courts and Commission have applied the phrase "in relation to" in s.725:

Rebecca Hope Duncan v Bullivants Pty Ltd [2026] FWC 1016

At a glance

Court

Decision date

Source

Judgment (3 paragraphs)

Parties

Legislation Cited (2)

Cases Cited (6)

Rebecca Hope Duncan v Bullivants Pty Ltd [2026] FWC 1016 (25 March 2026)