[2024] VSC 691
General information, not legal advice.
Supreme Court of Victoria
2024-11-08
Elliott J
Original judgment source is linked above.
[1] A pseudonym has been used to ensure compliance with s 166 of the Family Violence Protection Act 2008 (Vic).
[3] The order was due to expire on 11 October 2024.
[4] In addition, by a letter dated 3 July 2024, it was stated that the Department had an "expectation" that JP and his former partner use the "my family wizard" application to communicate any changes to their child custody arrangements, and that all communications between JP and his former partner were to be made using that application. As neither party was able to indicate whether this expectation imposed any obligations upon JP, it has not been taken into account as a relevant matter on this application.
[6] At the hearing, the prosecution conceded that the sister of JP's former partner had declined to provide a statement to police. The prosecution also conceded that the recording of the telephone call did not capture anything allegedly said by JP.
[8] Compare ibid, s 8(1)(e); see also Re Tilley [2024] VSC 274, [59]-[64].
[11] Ibid, ss 4AA(2)(c)(i), 4A.
[12] Re Ceylan [2018] VSC 361, [31]-[32] (Beach JA).
[13] See, for example, Re Brown [2019] VSC 751, [65] (Lasry J), and the cases there cited.
[16] Ibid, s 4E(3)(b). See also s 5AAA.
[20] As that term is defined in the Family Violence Protection Act.
[21] Family violence offence is defined in s 3 of the Bail Act as an offence against ss 37(2), 37A(2), 123(2), 123A(2) or 125A(1) of the Family Violence Protection Act or an offence where the conduct of the accused is family violence (as that term is defined in the Family Violence Protection Act).
[23] Ibid, s 5AAA(1).
[24] Ibid, s 5AAA(2)(a) and (b).
[25] Ibid, s 5AAA(2)(c) and (3).
[28] [2019] VSC 11, [53], [57]-[59] (Lasry J).