© 2026 Zoe. All rights reserved.
Zoe is a legal information platform. Always consult the Federal Register of Legislation for authoritative text.
[2019] AATA 3530
appellant. The Tribunal affirms the decision not to grant the applicant a Student (Temporary) (Class TU) visa
The Administrative Appeals Tribunal upheld a decision to refuse a student visa because the applicant was not actually enrolled in a course of study when the Tribunal made its decision. Although the original refusal was based on concerns about whether the applicant genuinely intended to stay temporarily, the Tribunal discovered during the hearing that the applicant had no current enrolment. This is a strict requirement for the visa. The applicant was given multiple chances to prove he was enrolled, including time after the hearing, but provided no evidence. Without current enrolment, the visa criteria could not be met, so the refusal was affirmed.
AI-generated legal information, not legal advice. Zoe can make mistakes. Check the cited source, and for advice about your situation consult a qualified Australian lawyer.
1 cited instrument linked from this judgment.
This Direction provides guidance to decision makers on what factors require consideration when assessing the above paragraphs a to d, to determine whether the applicant genuinely intends to stay in Australia temporarily.
Decision makers must take a reasonable and balanced approach between the need to make a timely decision on a Student visa or Student Guardian visa application and the need to identify those applicants who, at time of decision, do not genuinely intend to stay in Australia temporarily
Part 2 of Direction No. 69 - Directions
Assessing the genuine temporary entrant criterion
The applicant's circumstances in their home country
The applicant's potential circumstances in Australia
If the applicant is a minor - the intentions of a parent, legal guardian or spouse of the applicant
The Tribunal affirms the decision not to grant the applicant a Student (Temporary) (Class TU) visa