//
[2025] NSWSC 1351
General information, not legal advice.
Supreme Court of NSW
2025-11-12
Lonergan J
Original judgment source is linked above.
Zoe will write a short plain-English brief of this judgment and email it to you: what it was about, what the court decided and why. It can take up to a minute.
General information, not legal advice.
Or create a free account to save it and ask Zoe follow-up questions.
Source: NSW Caselaw (www.caselaw.nsw.gov.au). Converted to plain text by ZoeLaw. Not the official version.
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Williams (No. 7) [2025] NSWSC 1351
Hearing dates: 12 November 2025
Date of orders: 12 November 2025
Decision date: 12 November 2025
Jurisdiction: Common Law
Before: Lonergan J
Decision: Juror is discharged.
Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – jury – discretionary discharge of juror
Legislation Cited: Jury Act 1977 (NSW)
Category: Procedural rulings
Parties: Rex (Crown)
Bryce Mark Williams (Accused)
Representation: Counsel:
N Marney & A Hughes (Crown)
N Carroll & S Dayeian (Accused)
Solicitors:
Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions (Crown)
Fahmy Lawyers (Accused)
File Number(s): 2022/00069385
Publication restriction: Nil
Yesterday, shortly before court commenced, we were notified that a juror had fainted in the jury room and was most unwell and unable to sit yesterday. I understand that juror was conveyed by ambulance to a nearby hospital and was assessed and sent home yesterday afternoon.
This morning we have received a note from a medical centre which states that the letter is to request an exemption from jury duty, explaining under the hand of a GP whose name is contained on MFI 292, that as the treating doctor of the relevant juror, he is requesting the juror be excused from jury duty due to medical conditions and health circumstances which include symptoms of dizziness and syncope, whilst on jury duty, which need further investigation and potentially treatment. It is specifically requested that the patient have an exemption from jury duty.
The doctor notes also that he has examined the patient today after her recent hospital admission.
In all the circumstances those at the bar table do not oppose the discharge of the juror. It seems to me that the medical certificate supports discharge of the juror pursuant to s 53B(a) of the Jury Act 1977 (NSW) based on the medical opinion set out above. I am satisfied that the juror has become so ill as to be unlikely to be able to serve as a juror before verdict would be delivered and in the circumstances I discharge that juror.
That leaves us with 14 jurors at a very late stage of the trial, day 44, where we will very soon be proceeding to final addresses and the summing-up and deliberations.
I take into account that late stage of the trial in being comfortable to discharge this juror, given that we still have 14 jurors.
I note in forming that view there is some indication that we may have to discharge another juror which would still leave 13 jurors at this late stage of the trial. I should note that, because we know that is a potential. Even taking that into account, I am satisfied under s 22 of the Act that this trial should continue with a reduced number of jurors, currently numbered 14, and that it is not unfair to any party to proceed accordingly.
**********
R
Williams