Where to start with an Australian legal problem: plain-English guides, with the legislation and case law behind them.

Platform

Legislation
Cases
Guides
Find a lawyer
Absurdities
Ask Zoe
Graph
Recently analysed

Free tools

Bond claim checker
Barking dog and noise diary
Support at Home statement check
All tools

Lawyers: our picks

Zoe

Where to start with an Australian legal problem: plain-English guides, with the legislation and case law behind them.

Platform

Legislation
Cases
Guides
Find a lawyer
Absurdities
Ask Zoe
Graph
Recently analysed

Free tools

Bond claim checker
Barking dog and noise diary
Support at Home statement check
All tools

Lawyers: our picks

Lawyers in Sydney
Lawyers in Melbourne
Lawyers in Brisbane
Lawyers in Perth
Family lawyers
Employment lawyers
Criminal lawyers
Wills and estates lawyers
Find a lawyer

Company

Pricing
API
Privacy
Terms
Support
X
LinkedIn
Instagram

Jurisdictions

Commonwealth
New South Wales
Queensland
Victoria
Western Australia
South Australia
Tasmania
Australian Capital Territory
Northern Territory

Zoe is a legal information platform. Always consult the Federal Register of Legislation for authoritative text.

Zoe

Legislation Cases Guides Find a lawyer Absurdities Ask Zoe Graph Pricing

Ask Zoe →

Home/Cases/[2001] QCA 71

QLDQCA

R v Von Snarski [2001] QCA 71

[2001] QCA 71

Court of Appeal (Qld)|2001-03-06|Before: Thomas JA, Wilson J and Douglas JJudgment of the Court

View original source

At a glance

Source facts

Court

Court of Appeal (Qld)

Decision date

2001-03-06

Before

Thomas JA, Wilson J and Douglas JJudgment of the Court

Catchwords

CRIMINAL LAW – PARTICULAR OFFENCES – DRUG OFFENCES –
appellant charged with permitting premises to be used for
production of a
dangerous drug – s 11 Drugs Misuse Act CRIMINAL LAW –

Source

Original judgment source is linked above.

Catchwords

CRIMINAL LAW – PARTICULAR OFFENCES – DRUG OFFENCES –appellant charged with permitting premises to be used forproduction of adangerous drug – s 11 Drugs Misuse Act CRIMINAL LAW –GENERAL MATTERS – EFFECT OF PARTICULAR WORDS – KNOWINGLY PERMIT ORSUFFER – whether appellanthad sufficient knowledge – whetherappellant exercised sufficient control over premises – meaning of'permitting' and'occupation'CRIMINAL LAW – GENERAL MATTERS– CIRCUMSTANTIAL EVIDENCE – DIRECTION TO JURY- where evidencecapable of provingoccupation and knowledge – whether error in directingjuryCriminal Code (Qld), s 668E (1)AdelaideCorporation v Australasian Performing Right Association Ltd [1928] HCA 10(1928) 40 CLR481, consideredR v Lonie and Groom (1999) NSW CCA 319,distinguishedR v Smythe [1997] 2 Qd R 223, consideredThow vCampbell [1996] QCA 522[1997] 2 Qd R 324, considered

R v Von Snarski [2001] QCA 71 | Case summary | Zoe

Judgment (1 paragraphs)

[1]

Director of Public Prosecutions (Queensland) for the respondent

Parties

Applicant/Plaintiff:

Respondent/Defendant:

Von Snarski [2001] QCA 71

Cases Cited (1)

(1928) 40 CLR 481