//
© 2026 Zoe. All rights reserved.
Zoe is a legal information platform. Always consult the Federal Register of Legislation for authoritative text.
[2016] ACTSC 22
Supreme Court of the ACT
2016-02-17
Mossop AsJ
Original judgment source is linked above.
The application by the accused for a costs order in relation to the application in proceedings dated 29 July 2015 is dismissed.
I certify that the preceding sixty [60] numbered paragraphs are a true copy of the Reasons for Judgment of his Honour Associate Justice Mossop.
R
Richardson [2016] ACTSC 22
Argos Pty Ltd v Corbell, Minister for the Environment and Sustainable Development [2012] ACTSC 102
Attorney-General of Queensland v Holland [1912] HCA 26; (1912) 15 CLR 46
Byrnes v Barry [2004] ACTCA 24
Financial Integrity Group Limited v Farmer and Bravium Pty Limited [2009] ACTSC 143
Jago v District Court (NSW) [1989] HCA 46; (1989) 168 CLR 23
Latoudis v Casey [1990] HCA 59; (1990) 170 CLR 534
Nelson v Heil [2013] ACTSC 11
R v Bui [2011] ACTSC 102
R v J [1983] FCA 228; (1983) 49 ALR 376
R v Salasch [2001] ACTSC 70
R v Scott [1993] FCA 398; (1993) 42 FCR 1
R v Zdravkovic [2015] ACTSC 154
(1912) 15 CLR 46
(1993) 11 WAR 159
(1989) 168 CLR 23
(1990) 170 CLR 534
(1972) 21 FLR 131
(1988) 81 ALR 656
(1983) 49 ALR 376
(1993) 42 FCR 1