//
© 2026 Zoe. All rights reserved.
Zoe is a legal information platform. Always consult the Federal Register of Legislation for authoritative text.
[2006] QCA 202
Court of Appeal (Qld)
2006-06-09
McPherson and Keane JJA and Chesterman JSeparate, reasons for judgment for each member of the Court, Keane JJA and Chesterman J, concurring as to the orders made, McPherson
Original judgment source is linked above.
Source: Queensland Judgments (Supreme Court Library Queensland) (www.queenslandjudgments.com.au). Converted to plain text by ZoeLaw. Not the official version.
Footnotes
1 Knight v The Queen (1992) 175 CLR 495 at 503, 505; Cutter v The Queen (1997) 71 ALJR 638 at 641, 648.
2 R v Hyam [1975] AC 55 at 73; Cutter v The Queen (1997) 71 ALJR 638 at 648.
3Crofts v The Queen (1996) 186 CLR 427 at 440 - 441; Gilbert v The Queen [2000] HCA 15 at [13] and [31]; (2000) 201 CLR 414 at 420 and 425; R v Davidson [2000] QCA 39, CA No 369 of 1999, 28 July 2000 at [13]; R v DAK [2005] QCA 211, CA No 45 of 2005, 17 June 2005 at [17].
4 (1985) 156 CLR 464.
5 See (1985) 156 CLR 464 at 466 - 467.
6 (1985) 156 CLR 464 at 469 - 470 (citations footnoted in original).
7 [1975] AC at 82.
8 [1975] AC at 86.
9 [1975] AC at 96.
10 [1975] AC at 74 - 75.
11 (1961) 108 CLR 56 at 59.
12 [1985] 2 Qd R 413.
13 [1985] 2 Qd R 413 at 417 - 419.
14 (1997) 71 ALJR 638 at 648.
15 [1985] 2 Qd R 413 at 416 - 417.
16 [2002] QCA 442 at [2], [24] - [30], [33] - [36].
17 (2006) 45 MVR 391.
18 (2002) 211 CLR 85 at 92-93 [28] - [30].
19 (2002) 211 CLR 85 at 92-93 [28] - [30] (citations footnoted in original).
20 (2002) 211 CLR 85 at 92-93 [53] - [59] (citations footnoted in original).
21 [2002] QCA 235.
22 [2005] QCA 33 at [21].
23 As to which see R v G E Nelson CA No 324 of 1986, R v Williams [2002] QCA 142; R v Perussich [2001] QCA 557. See also R v Laus [2005] QCA 33.
Knight v The Queen (1992) 175 CLR 495 at 503, 505; Cutter v The Queen (1997) 71 ALJR 638 at 641, 648. ↩
R v Hyam [1975] AC 55 at 73; Cutter v The Queen (1997) 71 ALJR 638 at 648. ↩
Crofts v The Queen (1996) 186 CLR 427 at 440 - 441; Gilbert v The Queen [2000] HCA 15 at [13] and [31]; (2000) 201 CLR 414 at 420 and 425; R v Davidson [2000] QCA 39, CA No 369 of 1999, 28 July 2000 at [13]; R v DAK [2005] QCA 211, CA No 45 of 2005, 17 June 2005 at [17]. ↩
(1985) 156 CLR 464. ↩
See (1985) 156 CLR 464 at 466 - 467. ↩
(1985) 156 CLR 464 at 469 - 470 (citations footnoted in original). ↩
[1975] AC at 82. ↩
[1975] AC at 86. ↩
[1975] AC at 96. ↩
[1975] AC at 74 - 75. ↩
(1961) 108 CLR 56 at 59. ↩
[1985] 2 Qd R 413. ↩
R
Reid [2006] QCA 202
(1986) 161 CLR 10
(1936) 55 CLR 253
(1997) 71 ALJR 638
(2002) 190 ALR 441
(1985) 157 CLR 523
(1973) 133 CLR 209
(1992) 175 CLR 495
(1989) 2 WAR 316
(1962) 111 CLR 610
(1985) 156 CLR 464
(1994) 179 CLR 137
(2005) 80 ALJR 91
(1961) 108 CLR 56
(1984) 154 CLR 404
(1963) 110 CLR 234
(1998) 193 CLR 1
(1906) 4 CLR 311
(1996) 186 CLR 427
(2000) 201 CLR 414
(2006) 45 MVR 391
(2002) 211 CLR 85
[1985] 2 Qd R 413 at 417 - 419. ↩
(1997) 71 ALJR 638 at 648. ↩
[1985] 2 Qd R 413 at 416 - 417. ↩
[2002] QCA 442 at [2], [24] - [30], [33] - [36]. ↩
(2006) 45 MVR 391. ↩
(2002) 211 CLR 85 at 92-93 [28] - [30]. ↩
(2002) 211 CLR 85 at 92-93 [28] - [30] (citations footnoted in original). ↩
(2002) 211 CLR 85 at 92-93 [53] - [59] (citations footnoted in original). ↩
[2002] QCA 235. ↩
[2005] QCA 33 at [21]. ↩
As to which see R v G E Nelson CA No 324 of 1986, R v Williams [2002] QCA 142; R v Perussich [2001] QCA 557. See also R v Laus [2005] QCA 33. ↩