Where to start with an Australian legal problem: plain-English guides, with the legislation and case law behind them.

Platform

Legislation
Cases
Guides
Find a lawyer
Absurdities
Ask Zoe
Graph
Recently analysed

Free tools

Bond claim checker
Barking dog and noise diary
Support at Home statement check
All tools

Lawyers: our picks

Zoe

Where to start with an Australian legal problem: plain-English guides, with the legislation and case law behind them.

Platform

Legislation
Cases
Guides
Find a lawyer
Absurdities
Ask Zoe
Graph
Recently analysed

Free tools

Bond claim checker
Barking dog and noise diary
Support at Home statement check
All tools

Lawyers: our picks

Lawyers in Sydney
Lawyers in Melbourne
Lawyers in Brisbane
Lawyers in Perth
Family lawyers
Employment lawyers
Criminal lawyers
Wills and estates lawyers
Find a lawyer

Company

Pricing
API
Privacy
Terms
Support
X
LinkedIn
Instagram

Jurisdictions

Commonwealth
New South Wales
Queensland
Victoria
Western Australia
South Australia
Tasmania
Australian Capital Territory
Northern Territory

Zoe is a legal information platform. Always consult the Federal Register of Legislation for authoritative text.

R v Pangilinan [2001] QCA 81 | Case summary | Zoe

Zoe

Legislation Cases Guides Find a lawyer Absurdities Ask Zoe Graph Pricing

Ask Zoe →

Home/Cases/[2001] QCA 81

QLDQCA

R v Pangilinan [2001] QCA 81

[2001] QCA 81

Court of Appeal (Qld)|2001-03-13|Before: McMurdo P, Williams JA, Wilson JJudgment of the Court

View original source

At a glance

Source facts

Court

Court of Appeal (Qld)

Decision date

2001-03-13

Before

McMurdo P, Williams JA, Wilson JJudgment of the Court

Catchwords

CRIMINAL LAW – APPEAL AND NEW TRIAL, PARDON AND ENQUIRY AFTER
CONVICTION – APPEAL AND NEW TRIAL – PARTICULAR GROUNDS
–
UNREASONABLE OR INSUPPORTABLE VERDICT – PARTICULAR CASES – appellant

Source

Original judgment source is linked above.

Catchwords

CRIMINAL LAW – APPEAL AND NEW TRIAL, PARDON AND ENQUIRY AFTERCONVICTION – APPEAL AND NEW TRIAL – PARTICULAR GROUNDS–UNREASONABLE OR INSUPPORTABLE VERDICT – PARTICULAR CASES – appellantconvicted of murder – whether verdictof jury internallyinconsistentMacKenzie v R (1996) 190 CLR 348, considered

Judgment (1 paragraphs)

[1]

Director of Public Prosecutions (Queensland) for the respondent

Parties

Applicant/Plaintiff:

Respondent/Defendant:

Pangilinan [2001] QCA 81

Cases Cited (1)

(1996) 190 CLR 348