QLDQCA
R v Lund [2001] QCA 156
[2001] QCA 156
Court of Appeal (Qld)|2001-04-27|Before: Thomas JA, Chesterman and Holmes JJ, Judgment of the Court
View original sourceAt a glance
Source factsCourt
Court of Appeal (Qld)
Decision date
2001-04-27
Before
Thomas JA, Chesterman and Holmes JJ, Judgment of the Court
Catchwords
- CRIMINAL LAW – APPEAL AND NEW TRIAL AND INQUIRY AFTER CONVICTION
- – APPEAL AND NEW TRIAL – APPEAL AGAINST SENTENCE
- – APPEAL BY
- CONVICTED PERSON – APPLICATION TO REDUCE SENTENCE – WHEN REFUSED
Source
Original judgment source is linked above.
Catchwords
CRIMINAL LAW – APPEAL AND NEW TRIAL AND INQUIRY AFTER CONVICTION– APPEAL AND NEW TRIAL – APPEAL AGAINST SENTENCE– APPEAL BYCONVICTED PERSON – APPLICATION TO REDUCE SENTENCE – WHEN REFUSED– GENERALLY – where appellantpleaded guilty – where there isno evidence to support a claim of inducement to plead guilty – whetherdisparity betweenappellants sentence and co-offenders sentenceappropriateThe Queen v Gadaloff [1999] QCA 286CA No 24 of 1999,24 September 1999, followed
Judgment (1 paragraphs)
[1]
Director of Public Prosecutions (Queensland) for the respondent