/

/

Where to start with an Australian legal problem: plain-English guides, with the legislation and case law behind them.

Platform

Legislation
Cases
Guides
Find a lawyer
Absurdities
Ask Zoe
Graph
Recently analysed

Free tools

Bond claim checker
Barking dog and noise diary
Support at Home statement check
All tools

Lawyers: our picks

Lawyers in Sydney
Lawyers in Melbourne
Lawyers in Brisbane
Lawyers in Perth
Family lawyers
Employment lawyers
Criminal lawyers
Wills and estates lawyers
Find a lawyer

Company

Pricing
API
Privacy
Terms
Support
X
LinkedIn
Instagram

Jurisdictions

Commonwealth
New South Wales
Queensland
Victoria
Western Australia
South Australia
Tasmania
Australian Capital Territory
Northern Territory

© 2026 Zoe. All rights reserved.

Zoe is a legal information platform. Always consult the Federal Register of Legislation for authoritative text.

Legislation Cases Guides Find a lawyer Absurdities Ask Zoe Graph Pricing

Home/Cases/[2003] ACTSC 9

ACTACTSC

R v Fischetti & Sharma [2003] ACTSC 9

[2003] ACTSC 9

Supreme Court of the ACT|2003-02-23

View original source

At a glance

Source facts

Court

Supreme Court of the ACT

Decision date

2003-02-23

Source

Original judgment source is linked above.

Judgment (1 paragraphs)

[1]

R v Fischetti & Sharma [2003] ACTSC 9 (23 February 2003)

Parties

Applicant/Plaintiff:

R

Respondent/Defendant:

Fischetti & Sharma [2003] ACTSC 9

R v Fischetti & Sharma [2003] ACTSC 9 | Case summary | Zoe