/

/

Where to start with an Australian legal problem: plain-English guides, with the legislation and case law behind them.

Platform

Legislation
Cases
Guides
Find a lawyer
Absurdities
Ask Zoe
Graph
Recently analysed

Free tools

Bond claim checker
Barking dog and noise diary
Support at Home statement check
All tools

Lawyers: our picks

Lawyers in Sydney
Lawyers in Melbourne
Lawyers in Brisbane
Lawyers in Perth
Family lawyers
Employment lawyers
Criminal lawyers
Wills and estates lawyers
Find a lawyer

Company

Pricing
API
Privacy
Terms
Support
X
LinkedIn
Instagram

Jurisdictions

Commonwealth
New South Wales
Queensland
Victoria
Western Australia
South Australia
Tasmania
Australian Capital Territory
Northern Territory

© 2026 Zoe. All rights reserved.

Zoe is a legal information platform. Always consult the Federal Register of Legislation for authoritative text.

R v Fischetti & Caggiano [2003] ACTCA 5 | Case summary | Zoe

Legislation Cases Guides Find a lawyer Absurdities Ask Zoe Graph Pricing

Home/Cases/[2003] ACTCA 5

ACTACTCA

R v Fischetti & Caggiano [2003] ACTCA 5

[2003] ACTCA 5

Court of Appeal (ACT)|2003-03-31

View original source

At a glance

Source facts

Court

Court of Appeal (ACT)

Decision date

2003-03-31

Source

Original judgment source is linked above.

Judgment (1 paragraphs)

[1]

R v Fischetti & Caggiano [2003] ACTCA 5 (31 March 2003)

Parties

Applicant/Plaintiff:

R

Respondent/Defendant:

Fischetti & Caggiano [2003] ACTCA 5