[2025] NSWIRComm 1053
General information, not legal advice.
Industrial Relations Commission (NSW)
2025-07-21
Original judgment source is linked above.
(1) the requirements of s 35 have been met, principally, that the agreement does not, on balance, provide a net detriment to the employees when compared with the aggregate package of conditions of employment under the State awards: s 35(1)(b);
(2) the agreement can be approved consistent with the Principles for Approval of Enterprise Agreements ("Principles"), which have been set pursuant to s 33, unless the Commission is satisfied that any departure from those Principles would not prejudice the interests of any of the parties to the agreement: s 35(3). The Full Bench last reviewed the Principles on 23 February 2022 in Review of the Principles for Approval of Enterprise Agreements 2021/2022 [2022] NSWIRComm 1005. The current Principles set by the Full Bench are in Annexure A to that decision;
(3) in circumstances where employees are parties to the Agreement the special requirements of s 36 are met; and
(4) the provisions of s 37 which addresses the process of conducting secret ballots for the approval of enterprise agreements have been met."
The Application and materials in support of approval
(1) a Statement of Particulars appearing as Schedule 1 of the Application;
(2) affidavits of:
(a) Stacey Irwin, People and Culture Manager of the Council, affirmed 19 June 2025, deposing to amongst other things:
(i) a Comparison Statement between the Local Government (State) Award 2023 and the Agreement in response to Rule 6.9(2)(b) of the Industrial Relations Commission Rules in the form of a table annexed as Annexure A;
(ii) the additional benefits offered by the Agreement over the Award: par 11;
(iii) the timeline of the mutual gains bargaining and negotiations commencing on 3 September 2024: par 13;
(iv) information noting that the Agreement does not displace the skills-based structure for determining remuneration established at clauses 6-8 of the Award, ensuring equal remuneration is provided for men and women doing work of equal and comparable value: par 8;
(v) steps undertaken by her and others at the Executive and Management level of Council in relation to staff engagement and consultation and communications in relation to the Agreement: par 14; and
(vi) the Council understands the effect of the Agreement and has not entered into it under duress: pars 16-17.
(b) Danielle Kelly, an Organiser employed by the USU, affirmed 18 July 2025, deposing to amongst other things:
(i) a comparison of key conditions under the Agreement which are different changes from the conditions of employment under the Local Government (State) Award 2023 in the form of a table: par 14 and Annexure 1;
(ii) the USU's involvement in mutual gains bargaining and other negotiations for the Agreement: par 12;
(iii) her regular communication with USU members: par 6;
(iv) at various USU mass members meetings and site visits convened by her USU members voted unanimously in favour of the Agreement: par 15.
(c) Gordon Brock, an industrial relations consultant engaged by the LGEA, and formerly an official of the LGEA, deposing to amongst other things:
(i) the LGEA's involvement in mutual gains bargaining and other negotiations for the Agreement: pars 5-8;
(ii) regular communication with LGEA members: par 5;
(iii) circumstances of a meeting on 19 May 2025 to discuss the Agreement, attended by 70% of the LGEA membership: par 9;
(iv) 67% of the LGEA membership participated in the ballot which took place between 20 May 2025 and 30 May 2025 with all those voting to approve the Agreement: par 11; and
(v) the LGEA's consent to the making of the Agreement: par 12.
(d) Ian Robertson, Secretary of depa deposing to amongst other things:
(i) the depa delegate at the Council (later identified as Stephen Poulter), is very experienced and attended the meetings referred to in par 15 of Ms Irwin's affidavit: par 4;
(ii) the Agreement was put to a vote of depa's eight members who voted unanimously in favour of it: par 6;
(iii) his view that the Agreement satisfies the legislative obligations: par 8 and there was no duress applied during the negotiation process: par 7.
(1) the Agreement covers all employees of Council, except the General Manager employed by the Council (see cl 1.4);
(2) regulates totally the terms and conditions of employment for those employees covered by the Agreement (see cl 1.5);
(3) is for a period of three years (cl 1.3);
(4) the Agreement does not, on balance, provide a net detriment to employees when compared with the aggregate package of conditions of employment which would otherwise apply under the Award: see in particular Annexure A to Ms Irwin's affidavit and also Annexure 1 to Ms Kelly's affidavit;
(5) the parties understand the effect of the Agreement and have not entered into it under duress; and
(6) the Agreement contains a dispute resolution process (cl 68 - Workplace Issues).
(1) the Port Stephens Council Enterprise Agreement 2025-2028 is approved in accordance with s 35 of the Industrial Relations Act 1996 and will operate from 1 July 2025 and remain in force for a period of three years; and
(2) the Port Stephens Council Enterprise Agreement 2022-2025, EA 21/08, is rescinded pursuant to s 44 of the Industrial Relations Act 1996.
21 July 2025 - Minor amendment made - 'headnote' removed
22 July 2025 - Minor amendment - typographical error in [13]