[2026] WASC 9
General information, not legal advice.
Supreme Court of WA
2026-01-16
Original judgment source is linked above.
Where an infant is beneficially entitled to any property, the Court may, where it considers it necessary or desirable in the interest of the infant or of the infant and some other person, make an order -
(a) appointing a person to sell and convey, lease, mortgage or charge the property, or otherwise to exercise such of the powers as are conferred by or under this Act on a trustee, as the Court may in the order specify; or
(b) in the case of stock or a thing in action, vesting in any person the right to transfer or call for a transfer of that stock, or to receive the dividends or income thereof, or to sue for and recover that thing in action, upon such terms as the Court thinks fit.
I certify that the preceding paragraph(s) comprise the reasons for decision of the Supreme Court of Western Australia.
[1] Transfer of Land Act 1893 (WA) (TLA) s 59.
[2] The TLA refers to a person under the age of 18 years as a 'minor', the Trustees Act 1962 (WA) refers to such a person as an 'infant', whilst the Rules of the Supreme Court 1971 (WA) describe such a person as 'a person under a disability'. I have used 'minor' throughout these reasons to refer to a person under 18.
[3] See Rubery v Rubery [2003] WASC 164 [33], [38] - [40] (Barker J); Michaelson v The Registrar of Titles [2006] WASC 2 [21] (Simmons J).