[2020] VSCA 73
General information, not legal advice.
Court of Appeal (Vic)
2020-03-27
Priest JA, Weinberg JA
Original judgment source is linked above.
The applicant is sentenced as a serious sexual offender on charges 3, 4, 5 and 6.
[1] These reasons have been anonymised to avoid the risk of identifying the victim of sexual offending.
[2] Crimes Act 1958 (as amended by the Crimes (Sexual Offences) Act 1980), s 44(1). The maximum penalty is five years' imprisonment.
[3] Crimes Act 1958 (as amended by the Crimes (Sexual Offences) Act 1980), s 50(1). The maximum penalty is two years' imprisonment.
[4] Crimes Act 1958 (as amended by the Crimes (Rape) Act 1991), s 44(1). The maximum penalty is 20 years' imprisonment.
[6] R v Rumpf [1988] VicRp 55; [1988] VR 466, 475 ('Rumpf'); DPP v Rongonui [2007] VSCA 274; (2007) 17 VR 571, 580 [37], 581 [41]; Rootsey v The Queen [2018] VSCA 108, [8].
[8] His date of birth is 29 August 1945.
[10] We note that in his sentencing remarks, when dealing with the circumstances of the incest, the judge found 'that the objective offending in regard to Charge 6 is at the mid-range'. Insofar as such classifications have any utility, we consider the circumstances of the incest in this case take it beyond 'mid-range'.
[11] DPP v Toomey [2006] VSCA 90, [22].
[12] See DPP v Dalgliesh (a Pseudonym) [2017] HCA 41; (2017) 262 CLR 428. See also DPP v Dalgliesh (a Pseudonym) [2016] VSCA 148; DPP v Dalgliesh (a Pseudonym) [2017] VSCA 360; (2017) 271 A Crim R 1.
[13] See R v Jennings [1998] VSCA 69; [1999] 1 VR 352, 369 [66] (Brooking JA).
[14] The applicant is to be sentenced as a serious sexual offender on charges 3 to 6; so that, pursuant to s 6E of the Sentencing Act 1991, any term of imprisonment imposed on these charges must be served cumulatively unless otherwise directed. In contrast, the sentences on charges 1 and 2 are to be served concurrently unless otherwise ordered. As has previously been observed, strict compliance with the legislative regime is thus a somewhat cumbersome exercise. See Reid (a Pseudonym) v The Queen [2014] VSCA 145; (2014) 42 VR 295, 323 [119] (Priest JA).
[15] See DPP v Jones (a Pseudonym) [2013] VSCA 330; (2013) 40 VR 267, 288 [90] (Redlich and Priest JJA).
[16] R v Mulvale (unreported, 20 February 1996, Vic CA); R v Bernath [1997] 1 VR 271, 278; R v Yates (1998) 99 A Crim R 483; R v Watts [1998] 4 VR 244.
[17] R v Morgan (1980) 7 A Crim R 146, 154; Power v The Queen [1974] HCA 26; (1974) 131 CLR 623, 628, 629; Deakin v The Queen [1984] HCA 31; (1984) 58 ALJR 367; Bugmy v The Queen [1990] HCA 18; (1990) 169 CLR 525, 536.
Pitt (a pseudonym)
The Queen [2020] VSCA 73
[2019] VCC 487 (Judge McInerney)
(2007) 17 VR 571
(2017) 262 CLR 428
(2014) 42 VR 295
(2013) 40 VR 267
(1984) 58 ALJR 367
(1974) 131 CLR 623
(1990) 169 CLR 525