/

/

Where to start with an Australian legal problem: plain-English guides, with the legislation and case law behind them.

Platform

Legislation
Cases
Guides
Find a lawyer
Absurdities
Ask Zoe
Graph
Recently analysed

Free tools

Bond claim checker
Barking dog and noise diary
Support at Home statement check
All tools

Lawyers: our picks

Lawyers in Sydney
Lawyers in Melbourne
Lawyers in Brisbane
Lawyers in Perth
Family lawyers
Employment lawyers
Criminal lawyers
Wills and estates lawyers
Find a lawyer

Company

Pricing
API
Privacy
Terms
Support
X
LinkedIn
Instagram

Jurisdictions

Commonwealth
New South Wales
Queensland
Victoria
Western Australia
South Australia
Tasmania
Australian Capital Territory
Northern Territory

© 2026 Zoe. All rights reserved.

Zoe gives general legal information, not legal advice. For the authoritative text, check the official register of the law's own jurisdiction, such as the Federal Register of Legislation for Commonwealth laws.

PITSIKAS and GRIMES [2009] WASAT 80 | Case summary | Zoe

Legislation Cases Guides Find a lawyer Absurdities Ask Zoe Graph Pricing

Home/Cases/[2009] WASAT 80

WAWASAT

PITSIKAS and GRIMES [2009] WASAT 80 (29 April 2009)

[2009] WASAT 80

State Administrative Tribunal (WA)|2009-04-29

View original source

Ask Zoe how this case applies to you

Free, no account needed. General information, not legal advice.

General information, not legal advice.

At a glance

Source facts

Court

State Administrative Tribunal (WA)

Decision date

2009-04-29

Catchwords

_

Source

Original judgment source is linked above.

Catchwords

_

Judgment (3 paragraphs)

[1]

The application succeeds.
Mr Grimes must no later than 15 June 2009 remove the air-conditioner the subject of these proceedings from the common property and make good any damage that may have been caused to common property.
If Mr Grimes fail to comply with order 2 the strata company may remove the air-conditioner at the cost of Mr Grimes.

[2]

I certify that this and the preceding [38] paragraphs comprise the reasons for decision of the State Administrative Tribunal.

[3]

___________________________________

Legislation Cited (2)

Administrative Tribunal Act 2004

Titles Act 1985

Cases Cited (6)

PITSIKAS and GRIMES [2009] WASAT 80 (29 April 2009)

Arasi and The Owners of Beverly Court [2005] WASAT 197

Squelch and Brooklea Nominees Pty Ltd [2005] WASAT 198

Stanley and Owners of Waterloo Heights Strata Plan 4192 [2009] WASAT 55

The Owners of Habitat 74 - Strata Plan 222 and Betteridge [2005] WASAT 25

Whittick and Ridley [2005] WASAT 134