[2022] AATA 3380
General information, not legal advice.
Administrative Appeals Tribunal of Australia
2022-10-06
Original judgment source is linked above.
I certify that the preceding 34 (thirty -four) paragraphs are a true copy of the reasons for the decision herein of Member, P. Smith
.............................[SGD].........................................
[1] Anassis and National Disability Insurance Agency [2022] AATA 622 at [78(c)].
[2] N1112 v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2000] FCA 1597 at [17], per Emmett J.
[3] Ego Pharmaceuticals Pty Ltd v Minister for Health and Ageing [2010] AATA 935 at [3]; Negi and National Disability Insurance Agency [2022] AATA 1423 at [24]; Commissioner of Taxation v Cancer and Bowel Research Association Inc [2013] FCAFC 140 at [15].
[4] Re Scott and Australian Securities and Investments Commission [2009] AATA 798 at [3].
[5] Birdseye v Tax Practitioners Board [2020] FCA 1235 at [20], per Logan J.
[6] See sections 34J, 40 and 43 of the AAT Act.
Anassis and National Disability Insurance Agency [2022] AATA 622
Birdseye v Tax Practitioners Board [2020] FCA 1235
Commissioner of Taxation v Cancer and Bowel Research Association Inc [2013] FCAFC 140
Ego Pharmaceuticals Pty Ltd v Minister for Health and Ageing [2010] AATA 935
N1112 v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2000] FCA 1597
Negi and National Disability Insurance Agency [2022] AATA 1423
Re Scott and Australian Securities and Investments Commission [2009] AATA 798