//
[2025] NSWLEC 1154
General information, not legal advice.
Land and Environment Court (NSW)
2025-03-18
Porter C
Original judgment source is linked above.
Zoe will write a short plain-English summary of this judgment and email it to you for free: what it was about, what the court decided and why. It can take up to a minute.
General information, not legal advice.
Or create a free account to save it and ask Zoe follow-up questions.
Source: NSW Caselaw (www.caselaw.nsw.gov.au). Converted to plain text by ZoeLaw. Not the official version.
Medium Neutral Citation: O’Connor v Council of the Municipality of Woollahra [2025] NSWLEC 1154
Hearing dates: Conciliation conference on 27 and 28 February 2025
Date of orders: 18 March 2025
Decision date: 18 March 2025
Jurisdiction: Class 1
Before: Porter C
Decision: The Court orders:
(1) The appeal is upheld.
(2) Development application DA413/2023, as amended, for extensive alterations and additions (New Dwelling) including a new swimming pool and associated landscaping on Lot 1 in Deposited Plan 183374, known as 90 John Street, Woollahra, NSW, 2025, is determined by the grant of development consent subject to the conditions at Annexure A.
Catchwords: DEVELOPMENT APPEAL – dwelling – alterations and additions – conciliation conference – agreement between the parties - orders
Legislation Cited: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, ss 4.16, 8.7
Land and Environment Court Act 1979, ss 34AA, 34
Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation 2021, ss 27, 38
State Environmental Planning Policy (Biodiversity and Conservation) 2021, Ch 6
State Environmental Planning Policy (Resilience and Hazards) 2021, s 4.6
State Environmental Planning Policy (Sustainable Buildings) 2022
Woollahra Local Environmental Plan 2014, cll 2.7, 4.3, 4.4, 5.10, 6.1, 6.2
Category: Principal judgment
Parties: Stephen O’Connor (Applicant)
Council of the Municipality of Woollahra (Respondent)
Representation: Counsel:
M Staunton (Applicant)
S Patterson (Solicitor) (Respondent)
Solicitors:
Houston Dearn O’Connor Lawyers (Applicant)
Wilshire Webb Lawyers (Respondent)
File Number(s): 2024/438196
Publication restriction: Nil
COMMISSIONER: This is an appeal pursuant to s 8.7 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 (EPA Act) against the refusal of development application DA-413/2023. The development application seeks development consent for the alterations and additions including demolition of rear extensions, construction of a rear addition, basement, pool and associated internal and external works (DA) at 90 John Street, Woollahra legally described as Lot 1 in DP 183374 (site).
The Court notes that the Respondent, as the relevant consent authority, has approved under s 38 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation 2021 (EPA Regulation) to the Applicant amending development application DA-413/2023 in accordance with the documents listed below (amended DA):
| Reference | Description | Author | Date | | A1784346 | Basix Certificate | | 20/02/2025 | | DA-00.1 Rev D | Register, Location Map, Legend | Stephen O’Connor Architecture | 20/02/2025 | | DA-00-02 Rev D | Basix | Stephen O’Connor Architecture | 20/02/2025 | | DA-01. 1 Rev D | Existing Site Plan | Stephen O’Connor Architecture | 20/02/2025 | | DA-01. 2 Rev D | Existing Lower Ground Floor Plan | Stephen O’Connor Architecture | 20/02/2025 | | DA-01. 3 Rev D | Existing Ground Floor Plan | Stephen O’Connor Architecture | 20/02/2025 | | DA-01. 4 Rev D | Existing Roof Plan | Stephen O’Connor Architecture | 20/02/2025 | | DA-02. 1 Rev D | Existing East Elevation | Stephen O’Connor Architecture | 20/02/2025 | | DA-02. 2 Rev D | Existing West Elevation | Stephen O’Connor Architecture | 20/02/2025 | | DA-02. 3 Rev D | Existing South Elevation | Stephen O’Connor Architecture | 20/02/2025 | | DA-02. 4 Rev D | Existing North Elevation | Stephen O’Connor Architecture | 20/02/2025 | | DA-03. 1 Rev D | Existing Section A-A | Stephen O’Connor Architecture | 20/02/2025 | | DA-03. 2 Rev D | Existing Section B-B | Stephen O’Connor Architecture | 20/02/2025 | | DA-03. 3 Rev D | Existing Section C-C | Stephen O’Connor Architecture | 20/02/2025 | | DA-03. 4 Rev D | Existing Section D-D | Stephen O’Connor Architecture | 20/02/2025 | | DA-03. 5 Rev D | Existing Section E-E | Stephen O’Connor Architecture | 20/02/2025 | | DA-03. 6 Rev D | Existing Section F-F | Stephen O’Connor Architecture | 20/02/2025 | | DA-04A. 1 Rev D | Proposed Site Plan | Stephen O’Connor Architecture | 20/02/2025 | | DA-04A. 2 Rev D | Proposed Basement | Stephen O’Connor Architecture | 20/02/2025 | | DA-04A. 3 Rev D | Proposed Lower Ground Floor | Stephen O’Connor Architecture | 20/02/2025 | | DA-04A. 4 Rev D | Proposed Ground Floor | Stephen O’Connor Architecture | 20/02/2025 | | DA-04A. 5 Rev D | Proposed First Floor | Stephen O’Connor Architecture | 20/02/2025 | | DA-04A. 6 Rev D | Proposed Roof Plan | Stephen O’Connor Architecture | 20/02/2025 | | DA-05. 1 Rev D | Proposed East Elevation | Stephen O’Connor Architecture | 20/02/2025 | | DA-05. 2 Rev D | Proposed West Elevation | Stephen O’Connor Architecture | 20/02/2025 | | DA-05. 3 Rev D | Proposed South Elevation | Stephen O’Connor Architecture | 20/02/2025 | | DA-05. 4 Rev D | Proposed North Elevation | Stephen O’Connor Architecture | 20/02/2025 | | DA-06. 1 Rev D | Proposed Section A-A | Stephen O’Connor Architecture | 20/02/2025 | | DA-07. 1 Rev D | Calculations | Stephen O’Connor Architecture | 20/02/2025 | | DA-08. 1 Rev D | Shadow Elevations 4 Ocean Street 9am & 10am | Stephen O’Connor Architecture | 20/02/2025 | | DA-08. 2 Rev D | Shadow Elevations 4 Ocean Street 11am & 12pm | Stephen O’Connor Architecture | 20/02/2025 | | DA-08. 3 Rev D | Shadow Elevations 4 Ocean Street 1pm & 2pm | Stephen O’Connor Architecture | 20/02/2025 | | DA-08. 4 Rev D | Shadow Elevations 4 Ocean Street 3pm | Stephen O’Connor Architecture | 20/02/2025 | | DA-09. 1 Rev D | Plan Shadow 9am & 10am | Stephen O’Connor Architecture | 20/02/2025 | | DA-09. 2 Rev D | Plan Shadow 11am & 12pm | Stephen O’Connor Architecture | 20/02/2025 | | DA-09. 3 Rev D | Plan Shadow 1pm & 2pm | Stephen O’Connor Architecture | 20/02/2025 | | DA-09. 4 Rev D | Plan Shadow 3pm | Stephen O’Connor Architecture | 20/02/2025 | | DA-10. 1 Rev D | Landscape Plan | Stephen O’Connor Architecture | 20/02/2025 | | DA-11. 1 Rev D | Proposed Materials | Stephen O’Connor Architecture | 20/02/2025 | | DA-12. 1 Rev D | Elevation Comparison | Stephen O’Connor Architecture | 20/02/2025 | | DA-12. 2 Rev D | Plan Comparison | Stephen O’Connor Architecture | 20/02/2025 | | DA-12. 3 Rev D | Plan Comparison | Stephen O’Connor Architecture | 20/02/2025 | | Rev 06 Sheet no. 01 – 14 | Storm Water Plans | H&M Consultancy | 22/01/2025 | | 2024008-Rev 2 | Proposed Residential Redevelopment Geotechnical and Hydrogeological Investigation Report | Elite Geosciences | 23/01/2025 | | 251538-OIL-DD | Acoustic Engineering Report | Prepared by Acoustic Consulting Engineers | 05/02/2025 | | Project 2024008 Rev 1 | Construction Environmental Management Plan | Elite Geosciences | 23/01/2025 |
The amendments are summarised as:
Increased pool setbacks including retention of hedges.
Increased building setbacks.
Increased basement setbacks.
Privacy measures to various windows.
Further information, including Geotechnical Reports.
The Court arranged a conciliation conference under s 34AA of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (LEC Act) between the parties, which was held on 26-27 February 2025. I have presided over the conciliation conference.
At the conciliation conference, the parties reached agreement as to the terms of a decision in the proceedings that would be acceptable to the parties. This decision involved the Court upholding the appeal for the amended DA and granting development consent to the amended DA subject to conditions.
I note that as part of the submitted s 34 agreement, the parties have submitted a jurisdictional statement setting out how the proposal has satisfied the jurisdictional requirements and other matters.
Under s 34(3) of the LEC Act, I must dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the parties’ decision if the parties’ decision is a decision that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions. The parties’ decision involves the Court exercising the function under s 4.16 of the EPA Act to grant consent to the development application.
There are jurisdictional prerequisites that must be satisfied before this function can be exercised. The parties identified the jurisdictional prerequisites of relevance in these proceedings and explained how the jurisdictional prerequisites have been satisfied. I am satisfied that the parties’ decision is one that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions, as required by s 34(3) of the LEC Act, as set out below.
I am satisfied that owners consent accompanied the DA. The DA was lodged to the Respondent on 7 November 2023. The Respondent notified the DA between 29 November 2023 to 14 November 2023 where a number of submissions objecting to the proposal were received. At the commencement of the proceedings, four objectors expressed their concerns orally. The Court and parties benefitted from understanding the concerns from three of the objector’s properties. A further written objection was also received on site.
As the parties have reached agreement, the Court takes no role in considering the merits of the proposal. The parties have taken the Court through their consideration of the concerns raised by objectors in the amended DA.
The site is zoned R2 Low Density Residential under the Woollahra Local Environmental Plan 2014 (WLEP). The proposed development for alterations and additions to a dwelling house is permitted with consent and I have had regard to the objectives of the zone.
The parties agree and I accept that the following applicable WLEP provisions are met:
Clause 2.7 requires development consent for demolition, as proposed within the amended DA.
Clause 4.3 height of buildings applies to the site and prescribes a maximum building height of 9.5m. The amended DA does not exceed the maximum building height as demonstrated by the architectural plans prepared by Stephen O’Connor Architecture dated 22 January 2025.
Clause 4.4E floor space ratio does not apply to the amended DA.
Clause 5.10 heritage conservation applies to the site, as the dwelling is a contributory dwelling in the Woollahra Heritage Conservation Area. I accept that the provisions have been appropriately considered by the heritage experts on the basis of the joint expert report filed 25 February 2025 and Heritage Impact Statement prepared by John Oultram Heritage and Design dated October 2023.
Clause 6.2 earthworks applies to the amended DA. I accept that the amended DA meets the provisions as demonstrated by the Geotechnical and Hydrogeological Investigation Report and Letter prepared by Elite Geosciences dated 23 January 2025, Construction Environmental Management Plan with Impact Assessment prepared by Elite Geosciences dated 21 February 2025, and Concept Stormwater Drainage Plans prepared by H&M Consultancy dated 22 January 2025 (stormwater plans).
Chapter 6 of State Environmental Planning Policy (Biodiversity and Conservation) 2021 (SEPP BC) applies to the site, which is located within the Sydney Harbour Catchment. Chapter 6.2 is relevant to the site.
The amended DA is accompanied by stormwater plans that adequately minimise stormwater impacts from the amended DA. The stormwater plans form part of the conditions of consent at Annexure A and further conditions within Annexure A will appropriately regulate ongoing stormwater management. I accept that the proposed development is unlikely to have an adverse environmental impact.
With consideration of the above and the jurisdictional statement, the parties agree, and I accept that the provisions of SEPP BC have been satisfied.
As the parties’ decision is a decision that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions, I am required under s 34(3) of the LEC Act to dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the parties’ decision.
In making the orders to give effect to the agreement between the parties, I was not required to, and have not, made any merit assessment of the issues that were originally in dispute between the parties.
I have considered the jurisdictional prerequisites and I am satisfied on the basis of the evidence before me that the agreement of the parties is a decision that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions.
The Court orders:
The appeal is upheld.
Development application DA413/2023, as amended, for extensive alterations and additions (New Dwelling) including a new swimming pool and associated landscaping on Lot 1 in Deposited Plan 183374, known as 90 John Street, Woollahra, NSW, 2025, is determined by the grant of development consent subject to the conditions at Annexure A.
**********
Annexure A
O'Connor
Council of the Municipality of Woollahra [2025] NSWLEC 1154