[2001] QCA 537
General information, not legal advice.
Court of Appeal (Qld)
2001-11-30
McPherson JA, Mackenzie and Mullins JJSeparate reasons for judgment of, each member of the Court, each concurring as to the orders made
Original judgment source is linked above.
Text from the judgment source.
SUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND
CITATION:
Nolan & Ors v Warne [2001] QCA 537
PARTIES:
PATRICK NOLAN and CYNTHIA MARGARET NOLAN (on their own behalf and as trustees of the P S Nolan Family Trust)
(first plaintiff by counterclaim/first appellant)
P S AND C M NOLAN & CO (a firm)
(second plaintiff by counterclaim/second appellant)
NOLAN & CO (a firm)
(third plaintiff by counterclaim/third appellant)
v
MARIA KATHLEEN WARNE
(defendant by counterclaim/respondent)
FILE NO/S:
Appeal No 3930 of 2001
SC No 2394 of 1997
DIVISION:
Court of Appeal
PROCEEDING:
General Civil Appeal
ORIGINATING COURT:
Supreme Court at Brisbane
DELIVERED ON:
30 November 2001
DELIVERED AT:
Brisbane
HEARING DATE:
19 November 2001
JUDGES:
McPherson JA, Mackenzie and Mullins JJ
Separate reasons for judgment of each member of the Court, each concurring as to the orders made
ORDER:
Appeal dismissed with costs
CATCHWORDS:
EQUITY - EQUITABLE REMEDIES - INJUNCTIONS - CONSIDERATIONS UPON WHICH COURT EXERCISES DISCRETION - FUTILITY OF REMEDY - where appellants sought inter alia a mandatory order or injunction that the respondent remove a levy bank from her land - whether the trial Judge should have ordered the injunction - where, by the time of the appeal, the levy bank had in fact been removed
APPEAL AND NEW TRIAL - APPEAL - PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE - QUEENSLAND - POWERS OF COURT - COSTS - where the appellants knew that the levy bank had been removed - whether the appellants should pay the respondent's costs of and incidental to the appeal
Corbett v Pallas (1995) Aust Torts R 81-329, considered
Gartner v Kidman [1962] HCA 27; (1962) 108 CLR 12, applied
Golden Casket Art Union Office, Re [1994] QCA 480; [1995] 2 Qd R 346, considered
Kidman v Page [1959] Qd R 53, considered
R v Gold Coast City Council, ex parte Raysun Pty Ltd [1971] QWN 13, considered
Scott v Shepherd (1773) 2 W Bl 892; [1746] EngR 121; 96 ER 525, considered
COUNSEL:
E J Lennon QC for the appellants
J C Bell QC, with J McKenna, for the respondent
SOLICITORS:
Gadens Lawyers for the appellants
McCullough Robertson for the respondent
Nolan & Ors
Warne [2001] QCA 537
(1962) 108 CLR 12