Z Zoe Where to start with an Australian legal problem: plain-English guides, with the legislation and case law behind them.
© 2026 Zoe. All rights reserved.
Zoe gives general legal information, not legal advice. For the authoritative text, check the official register of the law's own jurisdiction, such as the Federal Register of Legislation for Commonwealth laws.
Nalevansky v Thought Equity Motion Inc [2010] FWA 3707 | Case summary | Zoe
Home / Cases / [2010] FWA 3707 CTH FWA
Nalevansky v Thought Equity Motion Inc [2010] FWA 3707 [2010] FWA 3707
Fair Work Australia | 2010-05-12 | Before: Mr J
View original source Pro Pro General information, not legal advice.
At a glance Source facts Source Original judgment source is linked above.
(#P83_6789) [2010] FWAFB 3488 at [15] - [20]; Jones v Department of Energy and Minerals (1995) 60 IR 304, Kekeris v A. Hartrodt Australia Pty Ltd [2010] FWA 674
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
Parties Applicant/Plaintiff: Nalevansky
Respondent/Defendant: Thought Equity Motion Inc [2010] FWA 3707
Find a lawyer ZoeLaw is not a law firm. Picks are our opinion; we don't share your details.