Zoe

United States legal-change intelligence across legislation, regulation, and case law. Separate data plane, same Zoe spine.

Platform

Legislation
Cases
Ask Zoe
Recently analysed

Company

Pricing
API
X
LinkedIn
Instagram

Jurisdictions

Federal
Supreme Court

Zoe

United States legal-change intelligence across legislation, regulation, and case law. Separate data plane, same Zoe spine.

Platform

Legislation
Cases
Ask Zoe
Recently analysed

Company

Pricing
API
X
LinkedIn
Instagram

Jurisdictions

Federal
Supreme Court

Zoe is a legal information platform. Always consult the official source for authoritative text.

Nada Williams v The Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs [1985] FCA 298 - FCA 1985 case summary — Zoe

Zoe

Legislation Cases Absurdities Ask Zoe Graph Pricing

Ask Zoe →

Home/Cases/[1985] FCA 298

CTHFCA

Nada Williams v The Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs [1985] FCA 298

[1985] FCA 298

Federal Court of Australia|1985-07-03|Before: Beaum J

View original source

At a glance

Source facts

Court

Federal Court of Australia

Decision date

1985-07-03

Before

Beaum J

Source

Original judgment source is linked above.

Judgment (13 paragraphs)

[1]

BETWEEN: NADA WILLTAMS Applicant AND: THE MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND

[2]

MINUTES OF ORDER Judge making order: Beaumont, J. Date order made: 3 duly 1985.

[3]

i. Order that the application for an interim stay of

[4]

the deportation order in respect of Harry Williams be

[5]

refused. 2. Make no order as to costs. Note: Settlement and entry of orders 1s dealt with in

[6]

) ) NEW SOUTH WALES REGISTRY ) No. G154 of 1985 ) GENERAL DIVISTON )

[7]

BETWEEN : NADA WILLIAMS Applicant AND: THE MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND

[8]

Harry Williams v. The Minister for Immigration and Ethnic

[9]

Affairs (No. G155 of 1985) I propose to refuse this

[10]

application for an interim stay. In the circumstances, it

[11]

i. Order that the application for an interim stay of

[12]

the deportation order in respect of Harry Williams be

[13]

| certify that ttis and the A preco.u., page cre a t:t 2 copy of ihe reasons for judgment herein of The Honourable

Cited By (1)

Vincent Land Pty Ltd v Hyder Consulting Pty Ltd