Where to start with an Australian legal problem: plain-English guides, with the legislation and case law behind them.

Platform

Legislation
Cases
Guides
Find a lawyer
Absurdities
Ask Zoe
Graph
Recently analysed

Free tools

Bond claim checker
Barking dog and noise diary
Support at Home statement check
All tools

Lawyers: our picks

Zoe

Where to start with an Australian legal problem: plain-English guides, with the legislation and case law behind them.

Platform

Legislation
Cases
Guides
Find a lawyer
Absurdities
Ask Zoe
Graph
Recently analysed

Free tools

Bond claim checker
Barking dog and noise diary
Support at Home statement check
All tools

Lawyers: our picks

Lawyers in Sydney
Lawyers in Melbourne
Lawyers in Brisbane
Lawyers in Perth
Family lawyers
Employment lawyers
Criminal lawyers
Wills and estates lawyers
Find a lawyer

Company

Pricing
API
Privacy
Terms
Support
X
LinkedIn
Instagram

Jurisdictions

Commonwealth
New South Wales
Queensland
Victoria
Western Australia
South Australia
Tasmania
Australian Capital Territory
Northern Territory

Zoe is a legal information platform. Always consult the Federal Register of Legislation for authoritative text.

Murray, Lennon & Gilbert v Day [1968] SASC 58 | Case summary | Zoe

Zoe

Legislation Cases Guides Find a lawyer Absurdities Ask Zoe Graph Pricing

Ask Zoe →

Home/Cases/[1968] SASC 58

SASASC

Murray, Lennon & Gilbert v Day [1968] SASC 58

[1968] SASC 58

Supreme Court of SA|1968-06-27

View original source

At a glance

AI case summary

Result

mixed. Unknown - no judgment text available

Cited legislation

No linked legislation citations have been extracted yet.

Plain English Summary

This entry contains only citation metadata for Murray, Lennon & Gilbert v Day [1968] SASC 58. The actual judgment text is not available in the provided material - only a notice stating that no HTML version exists and directing users to PDF or text downloads. Without access to the substantive judgment, no legal analysis can be performed regarding the court's reasoning, the facts of the case, the legal issues determined, or the outcome.

AI-generated legal information, not legal advice. Zoe can make mistakes. Check the cited source, and for advice about your situation consult a qualified Australian lawyer.

Judgment (3 paragraphs)

[1]

Murray, Lennon & Gilbert v Day [1968] SASC 58 (27 June 1968)

[2]

Murray, Lennon & Gilbert v Day [1968] SASC 58 (27 June 1968)

[3]

There is no available HTML version of this document. Please wait to view PDF version or click on [Download] for other versions.

Parties

Applicant/Plaintiff:

Murray, Lennon & Gilbert

Respondent/Defendant:

Day [1968] SASC 58

AI Analysis

Outcomemixed

Disposition:

Unknown - no judgment text available