[37] The period for the Applicant to lodge his Application is not extended. The Application is dismissed.

[38] An Order to this effect will be issued with this decision.

Fair Work Commission|2018-12-17

for the reasons above, in the exercise of my discretion, I am not satisfied that exceptional circumstances as envisaged by s.366(2) of the Act arise in this case. I am not persuaded to exercise the discretion to allow a further period within which to lodge the Application.

[37] The period for the Applicant to lodge his Application is not extended. The Application is dismissed.

[38] An Order to this effect will be issued with this decision.

[1] Nulty v Blue Star Group, [2011] FWAFB 975; 2011, 203 IR 1 at [13].

[2] Wemyss v Mission Australia Employment Services [2010] FWA 1798.

[6] Kyvelos v Champion Socks Pty Ltd, Print T2421 [14].

[8] Nulty v Blue Star Group Pty Ltd [2011] FWAFB 975.

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

Mr Jason Cannon v Quad Services [2018] FWC 7651 (17 December 2018)

Mr Jason Cannon v Quad Services [2018] FWC 7651

At a glance

Court

Decision date

Source

Judgment (8 paragraphs)

Parties

Legislation Cited (1)

Cases Cited (2)

Mr Jason Cannon v Quad Services [2018] FWC 7651 (17 December 2018)