//
[2010] FWA 3217
General information, not legal advice.
Fair Work Australia
2010-04-27
Original judgment source is linked above.
(#P32_1802) Minda Inc/LHMU Interim Industrial Action Order 2010 PR996232.
(#P33_2036) Minda Inc/LHMU Interim Industrial Action Order 2010 No 2 PR996272.
(#P38_2671) Minda Inc/LHMU Final Industrial Action Order 2010 PR996398.
(#P55_4280) DR2010/92, DR2010/129
(#P87_6341) Exhibit A2.
(#P92_6543) Exhibit A3.
(#P218_19062) Transcript of proceedings on 26 February 2010: PN 15-20.
(#P241_21918) Section 461 of the Act provides that technical breaches of the protected action ballot provisions do not affect the validity of protected action.
(#P299_27494) [2009] FWAFB 1698, 15 December 2009 per Giudice J, Acton SDP and Whelan C.
(#P316_32185) NTEIU v University of South Australia [2010] FWAFB 1014, 14 April 2010 per Boulton J, Ives DP and Gay C.
(#P329_36218) Section 429 permits protected industrial action in certain circumstances to be undertaken after a suspension without the need for a new protected action ballot. Section 430 requires a new notice to be provided to the employer.
(#P386_43619) NTEIU v University of South Australia [2010] FWAFB 1014.
(#P397_45701) Including Ambulance Victoria v Liquor, Hospitality and Miscellaneous Union [2009] FWA 44, 3 August 2009 per Kaufman SDP.
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
Minda Incorporated
Liquor, Hospitality and Miscellaneous Union [2010] FWA 3217