I certify that this and the preceding [25] paragraphs comprise the reasons for decision of the State Administrative Tribunal.

Where to start with an Australian legal problem: plain-English guides, with the legislation and case law behind them.

Platform

Legislation
Cases
Guides
Find a lawyer
Absurdities
Ask Zoe
Graph
Recently analysed

Free tools

Bond claim checker
Barking dog and noise diary
Support at Home statement check
All tools

Lawyers: our picks

Lawyers in Sydney
Lawyers in Melbourne
Lawyers in Brisbane
Lawyers in Perth
Family lawyers
Employment lawyers
Criminal lawyers
Wills and estates lawyers
Find a lawyer

Company

Pricing
API
Privacy
Terms
Support
X
LinkedIn
Instagram

Jurisdictions

Commonwealth
New South Wales
Queensland
Victoria
Western Australia
South Australia
Tasmania
Australian Capital Territory
Northern Territory

Zoe gives general legal information, not legal advice. For the authoritative text, check the official register of the law's own jurisdiction, such as the Federal Register of Legislation for Commonwealth laws.

MILLROCK RESOURCES PTY LTD and QUESTA PTY LTD [2012] WASAT 229 | Case summary | Zoe

Zoe

Legislation Cases Guides Find a lawyer Absurdities Ask Zoe Graph Pricing

Ask Zoe →

Home/Cases/[2012] WASAT 229

WAWASAT

MILLROCK RESOURCES PTY LTD and QUESTA PTY LTD [2012] WASAT 229 (23 November 2012)

[2012] WASAT 229

State Administrative Tribunal (WA)|2012-11-23|Before: Ms J

View original source

General information, not legal advice.

Ask Zoe about this case

Free, no account needed. General information, not legal advice.

At a glance

Source facts

Court

State Administrative Tribunal (WA)

Decision date

2012-11-23

Before

Ms J

Catchwords

Source

Original judgment source is linked above.

Catchwords

Judgment (3 paragraphs)

[1]

The application is dismissed pursuant to s 46(2) of the State Administrative Tribunal Act 2004 (WA).
The respondent's application for costs pursuant to s 47 or, alternatively, s 87 of the State Administrative Tribunal Act 2004 (WA) is dismissed.

[2]

I certify that this and the preceding [25] paragraphs comprise the reasons for decision of the State Administrative Tribunal.

[3]

___________________________________

Legislation Cited (3)

Tenancy (Retail Shops) Agreements Act 1985

Administrative Tribunal Act 2004

Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 1998

Cases Cited (5)

MILLROCK RESOURCES PTY LTD and QUESTA PTY LTD [2012] WASAT 229 (23 November 2012)

Chew and Director General of The Department of Education and Training [2006] WASAT 248

Laurent and Commissioner of Police [2009] WASAT 254

Pearce & Anor and Germain [2007] WASAT 291 (S)

Questa Pty Ltd v Millrock Resources Pty Ltd [2012] WASC 267