QLDQCA
Metyor Inc & Anor v Queensland Electronic Switching P/L & Ors [2002] QCA 269
[2002] QCA 269
Court of Appeal (Qld)|2002-09-14|Before: McPherson and Williams JJA and Wilson JSeparate, reasons for judgment for each member of the Court, each concurring as to the, orders made
View original sourceAt a glance
Source factsCourt
Court of Appeal (Qld)
Decision date
2002-09-14
Before
McPherson and Williams JJA and Wilson JSeparate, reasons for judgment for each member of the Court, each concurring as to the, orders made
Catchwords
- CORPORATIONS - INTERNAL DISPUTES - USE OF COMPANY’S NAME - Fraud on
- the companyBurland v Earle [1902] AC 83, 93,
- appliedFerguson v Wallbridge [1935] 3 DLR 66, consideredFoss v
- Harbottle [1843] EngR 478
Source
Original judgment source is linked above.
Catchwords
CORPORATIONS - INTERNAL DISPUTES - USE OF COMPANY’S NAME - Fraud onthe companyBurland v Earle [1902] AC 83, 93,appliedFerguson v Wallbridge [1935] 3 DLR 66, consideredFoss vHarbottle [1843] EngR 478(1843) 2 Hare 461, discussedHurley v G H Nominees PtyLtd (1982) 31 SASR 250, appliedKaram v Australia & New ZealandBanking Group Ltd [2000] NSWSC 596(2000) 34 ACSR 545, appliedKeyrate Pty Ltd v HamarcPty Ltd [2001] NSWSC 491(2001) 38 ACSR 396, 398-400, appliedSpokes v Grosvenor HotelCo Ltd [1897] 2 QB 124, discussedCorporations Act 2001 (Cth)s 236, s 236(c), 236(1)(a), s 237, 237(1), s 237(2), s 237(2), s 237(2)(a),s 237(2)(d), s 237(2)(b), s 237(2)(c)
Judgment (11 paragraphs)
[1]