Zoe

Where to start with an Australian legal problem: plain-English guides, with the legislation and case law behind them.

Platform

Legislation
Cases
Guides
Find a lawyer
Absurdities
Ask Zoe
Graph
Recently analysed

Free tools

Bond claim checker
Barking dog and noise diary
Support at Home statement check
All tools

Lawyers: our picks

Zoe

Where to start with an Australian legal problem: plain-English guides, with the legislation and case law behind them.

Platform

Legislation
Cases
Guides
Find a lawyer
Absurdities
Ask Zoe
Graph
Recently analysed

Free tools

Bond claim checker
Barking dog and noise diary
Support at Home statement check
All tools

Lawyers: our picks

Lawyers in Sydney
Lawyers in Melbourne
Lawyers in Brisbane
Lawyers in Perth
Family lawyers
Employment lawyers
Criminal lawyers
Wills and estates lawyers
Find a lawyer

Company

Pricing
API
Privacy
Terms
Support
X
LinkedIn
Instagram

Jurisdictions

Commonwealth
New South Wales
Queensland
Victoria
Western Australia
South Australia
Tasmania
Australian Capital Territory
Northern Territory

Zoe is a legal information platform. Always consult the Federal Register of Legislation for authoritative text.

Melbourne City Link Authority v Teford Pty Ltd [1999] VSC 106 | Case summary | Zoe

Zoe

Legislation Cases Guides Find a lawyer Absurdities Ask Zoe Graph Pricing

Ask Zoe →

Home/Cases/[1999] VSC 106

VICVSC

Melbourne City Link Authority v Teford Pty Ltd [1999] VSC 106

[1999] VSC 106

Supreme Court of Victoria|1999-04-12|Before: Balmford, J.

View original source

At a glance

Source facts

Court

Supreme Court of Victoria

Decision date

1999-04-12

Before

Balmford, J.

Source

Original judgment source is linked above.

Judgment (1 paragraphs)

[1]

For the reasons given, the decision of the Tribunal will be set aside insofar as it relates to the assessment of compensation for loss in respect of executive time. In all other respects the decision of the Tribunal will be affirmed. Counsel may wish to make submissions as to costs.

Parties

Applicant/Plaintiff:

Melbourne City Link Authority

Respondent/Defendant:

Teford Pty Ltd [1999] VSC 106

Cases Cited (9)

[1999] VSC 106

;

Minister for Aboriginal Affairs v Peko-Wallsend Ltd

[1986] HCA 40

(1986) 162 CLR 24

Spencer v Commonwealth of Australia [1907] HCA 82; (1907) 5 CLR 418

Kentucky Fried Chicken Pty Ltd v Gantidis [1979] HCA 20; (1979) 140 CLR 675

Spurling v Development Underwriting (Vic.) Pty. Ltd. [1973] VicRp 1; [1973] VR 1

(1986) 162 CLR 24

(1992) 26 NSWLR 203

(1907) 5 CLR 418

(1979) 140 CLR 675