[2020] VCAT 1171
General information, not legal advice.
Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal
2020-10-20
Original judgment source is linked above.
(a) The sign's luminance (cd/m² or as a percentage of its maximum luminance) in minimum 10-minute intervals.
(b) The sign's photocell (light sensor) reading of the ambient light in minimum 10-minute intervals.
(c) All record information must be time and date stamped to show the time of measurement.
(a) Consist of more than one static image at a time.
(c) Consist of a sequence of images giving the illusion of movement from one image to the next.
(d) Contain or consist of images which are capable of being interpreted as projections beyond the face of the advertising screen, such as through the use of 3D technology.
(e) Contain or consist of video, movie or television broadcasts.
(f) Contain or consist of present-time or other contemporary update information such as relating to news, weather or time.
(g) Contain any flashing, blinking, brightening or fading elements that create the illusion of movement or change.
(h) Be capable of being mistaken for a traffic signal or a traffic control device. This includes the use of red, amber or green circles, octagons, crosses or triangles.
(i) Be a traffic instruction, or be capable of being mistaken as, an instruction to a road user. This includes the use of the wording stop, give way, slow, turn left or turn right.
(a) an attack by a computer hacker, virus or similar resulting in the unauthorised display of visual images or messages.
[1] The submissions and evidence of the parties, any supporting exhibits given at the hearing and the statements of grounds filed have all been considered in the determination of the proceeding. In accordance with the practice of the Tribunal, not all of this material will be cited or referred to in these reasons.
[3] Pursuant to clause 66.03 of the scheme.
[4] Pursuant to section 61(2) of the Planning and Environment Act 1987.
[5] Source: Council's submissions, paragraph 8.
[6] Image taken from Mr Hodges evidence.
[7] Image taken from Mr Hodges evidence.
[8] Image taken from Mr Hodges evidence.
[9] Image taken from Mr Hodges evidence.
[10] Maple Media Pty Ltd v Greater Dandenong CC [2020] VCAT 46 (Maple Media)
[12] AustRoads Research Report (AP-R420-13)
[13] Young K, Stephens A, Logan D & Lenne M (2015). 'An On-Road Study of the
Effect of Roadside Advertising on Driving Performance and Situational Awareness',
Maple Media Pty Ltd
Wyndham CC [2020] VCAT 1171