© 2026 Zoe. All rights reserved.
Zoe is a legal information platform. Always consult the Federal Register of Legislation for authoritative text.
austlii:qld/QBCCMCmr/2014/327
defendant. Application dismissed
2 cited instruments linked from this judgment.
A body corporate owner complained that the chairperson was spending money on building improvements without proper approval. While the adjudicator agreed this had happened, the owners later held a meeting where they formally approved (ratified) the spending and promised to follow proper procedures in future. Because the owners had now approved the spending, there was no need for court orders to stop it. The case was dismissed.
AI-generated legal information, not legal advice. Zoe can make mistakes. Check the cited source, and for advice about your situation consult a qualified Australian lawyer.
Main Beach Tower [2014] QBCCMCmr 327
Sections 227(1)(b) and 229(3)(a) of the Body Corporate and Community Management Act 1997 (Qld) (BCCMA), applying the BCCMA and the Body Corporate and Community Management (Standard Module) Regulation 2008 (Standard Module).
EXPENDITURE - whether spending on capital works unauthorised - whether spending subsequently ratified.
I hereby order that the application is dismissed.
[1] The applicant says body corporate funds were being spent on capital works without the spending being properly authorised by a body corporate or committee resolution. On 20 May 2014, I granted an interim order prohibiting further spending without the spending being authorised by a body corporate resolution. It is now time to consider whether further orders to restrain future spending are necessary.
[2] All owners were invited to make submissions. A number of owners and committee members provided information that satisfies me the chairperson did commit the body corporate to spending on capital improvements that had not been properly authorised.
[3] I am pleased to see that, at a general meeting on 1 August 2014, owners voted 30 to nil in favour of a motion arguing against any accepted culture of spending without proper authorisation and confirming any body corporate spending should strictly comply with legislative requirements. Further, I am satisfied by the submissions that the chairperson did commit the body corporate to spending on capital improvements in excess of the amount the body corporate had properly authorised. However, the minutes of the 1 August 2014 general meeting show that owners voted to ratify and approve this additional spending. I am therefore satisfied the present dispute has been overtaken by events and no further orders are necessary. The application will therefore be dismissed.
Application dismissed