United States legal-change intelligence across legislation, regulation, and case law. Separate data plane, same Zoe spine.

Platform

Legislation
Cases
Ask Zoe
Recently analysed

Company

Pricing
API
X
LinkedIn
Instagram

Jurisdictions

Federal
Supreme Court

District of Columbia

© 2026 Zoe. All rights reserved.

Zoe is a legal information platform. Always consult the official source for authoritative text.

Legislation Cases Absurdities Ask Zoe Graph Pricing

Home/Cases/[2001] QCA 212

QLDQCA

Laurelmont P/L v Stockdale & Leggo

[2001] QCA 212

Court of Appeal (Qld)|2001-06-05|Before: Dutney J, Pherson JA, Williams JA

View original source

At a glance

Source facts

Court

Court of Appeal (Qld)

Decision date

2001-06-05

Before

Dutney J, Pherson JA, Williams JA

Source

Original judgment source is linked above.

Judgment (4 paragraphs)

[1]

Laurelmont P/L v Stockdale & Leggo (Qld) P/L & Anor [2001] QCA 212 (5 June 2001)

[2]

[3]

(ACN 004 349 713) Second Defendant/Second Respondent

[4]

THE PRESIDENT: This appeal was heard by a Court consisting of Justices of Appeal McPherson and Williams and Justice Dutney. The order is the appeal is dismissed with costs. I publish the separate reasons for judgment of each member of the Court each concurring as to the order made.

Parties

Applicant/Plaintiff:

# Laurelmont P/L

Respondent/Defendant:

Stockdale & Leggo

Laurelmont P/L v Stockdale & Leggo - [2001] QCA 212 - QCA 2001 case summary — Zoe