United States legal-change intelligence across legislation, regulation, and case law. Separate data plane, same Zoe spine.

Platform

Legislation
Cases
Ask Zoe
Recently analysed

Company

Pricing
API
X
LinkedIn
Instagram

Jurisdictions

Federal
Supreme Court

District of Columbia

© 2026 Zoe. All rights reserved.

Zoe is a legal information platform. Always consult the official source for authoritative text.

Lamb v Bunnings Group Limited [2013] FWCFB 2698 - FWCFB 2013 case summary — Zoe

Legislation Cases Absurdities Ask Zoe Graph Pricing

Home/Cases/[2013] FWCFB 2698

CTHFWCFB

Lamb v Bunnings Group Limited [2013] FWCFB 2698

[2013] FWCFB 2698

Fair Work Commission (Full Bench)|2013-05-14|Before: Mr J

View original source

At a glance

Source facts

Court

Fair Work Commission (Full Bench)

Decision date

2013-05-14

Before

Mr J

Source

Original judgment source is linked above.

Judgment (6 paragraphs)

[1]

(#P28_1087) AE884757.

[2]

(#P119_14071) [2005] HCA 10; (2005) 222 CLR 241.

[3]

(#P132_16993) [1996] IRCA 166; (1996) 66 IR 182.

[4]

(#P141_18259) (1982) 149 CLR 337.

[5]

(#P152_21393) [1979] HCA 32; (1979) 180 CLR 322.

[6]

(#P179_26184) "Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union" known as the Australian Manufacturing Workers' Union (AMWU) v Silcar Pty Ltd [2011] FWAFB 2555.

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

Parties

Applicant/Plaintiff:

# Lamb

Respondent/Defendant:

Bunnings Group Limited \[2013\] FWCFB 2698

Legislation Cited (1)

Work Act 2009

Cases Cited (4)

(2005) 222 CLR 241

(1996) 66 IR 182

(1982) 149 CLR 337

(1979) 180 CLR 322